Hello
For the Horizontal and vertical mixing combination, please try U3 and C4, or both A4.
You set the temperature and salinity closed condition at Northern boundary. Try RadNud and set the proper value with Tnudg, M3nudg and OBCFAC.
Search found 170 matches
- Fri Oct 11, 2024 11:59 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Abnormal water temperature during the ROMS simulation of typhoons.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 648
- Sun Apr 21, 2024 12:55 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Roms blowing up due to MaxSpeed = 2.0E+01
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4694
Re: Roms blowing up due to MaxSpeed = 2.0E+01
Seems like your initial condition does not match with the boundary condition.
Could you plot your initial condition(u,v, temp, salt) here?
Could you plot your initial condition(u,v, temp, salt) here?
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 9:13 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Roms blowing up due to MaxSpeed = 2.0E+01
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4694
Re: Roms blowing up due to MaxSpeed = 2.0E+01
Please check out your lateral boundary conditions. I saw many 0 value at eastern and western boundaries. Also, when it blows up, could you plot horizontal u, v, temp, salt and upload here? It might not the major cause but I doubt about your unit at the humidity. Are you sure that it is relative ...
- Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:48 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Roms blowing up due to MaxSpeed = 2.0E+01
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4694
Re: Roms blowing up due to MaxSpeed = 2.0E+01
hello
1. The bathymetry was not smoothed. The value of rx0, rx1 are too high.
2. Please check out the unit of the Sea level pressure.
3. Please check out the humidity(specific, or relative) unit and match the unit in varinfo.dat
-JH
1. The bathymetry was not smoothed. The value of rx0, rx1 are too high.
2. Please check out the unit of the Sea level pressure.
3. Please check out the humidity(specific, or relative) unit and match the unit in varinfo.dat
-JH
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:23 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Issue with WEC_VF in ROMS-SWAN coupled model
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6363
Issue with WEC_VF in ROMS-SWAN coupled model
Hello, We are currently using the ROMS-SWAN coupled model. The COAWST version we're using is 3.8, and there are no issues when running ROMS or SWAN individually. However, when attempting the coupling, especially with #define WEC_VF, we are encountering the following message. For your information, we ...
- Wed Jan 10, 2024 1:35 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: COAWST JOE_TC case compile error
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27702
Re: COAWST JOE_TC case compile error
I am using COAWST model (V3.8) with ROMS and SWAN couple. I tried to compile the RIP_CURRENT case and faced with this error. I had no problem compile with ROMS only. I only get this error when I compile with SWAN only or ROMS & SWAN. I am using ifort(intel18). Netcdf(4.6.1) Total log file from ...
- Tue Jun 14, 2022 2:01 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: too high bottom temperature result in estuary
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16406
Re: too high bottom temperature result in estuary
#define TS_C4HADVECTION #define TS_U3VADVECTION needs to be written as #define TS_U3HADVECTION #define TS_C4VADVECTION Seems like you provide 6 hourly wind stress while the heat flux is coming from mean value. I would not recommend diurnal_srflux if this is the case. From what I experienced, it ...
- Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:49 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: DIAG speed trouble 20.125553145124616. Blowing-up: Saving latest model state into RESTART file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6251
Re: DIAG speed trouble 20.125553145124616. Blowing-up: Saving latest model state into RESTART file
Well if that is the case, First of all, I would plot every snapshot of temperature, salinity, current and sea surface height variable. And also I would run the model without surface forcing and lateral boundary condition(closed). If the model is stable without forcing(surface/lateral), then I would ...
- Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:56 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: DIAG speed trouble 20.125553145124616. Blowing-up: Saving latest model state into RESTART file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6251
Re: DIAG speed trouble 20.125553145124616. Blowing-up: Saving latest model state into RESTART file
Dear Sankar,
I just saw that your E-P file shows large value which is possibly filled with blank or NaN value.
Please check out fresh water flux file.
-Joonho
I just saw that your E-P file shows large value which is possibly filled with blank or NaN value.
Please check out fresh water flux file.
-Joonho
- Fri Nov 19, 2021 9:16 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: The model blows up in the first step
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8303
Re: The model blows up in the first step
1. I see your nothern zeta,vbar and ubar value are 0. 2. Your rx0 value of the nesting model is too high. 3. It is not possible reason for blowing up, but I was wondering setting the boundary condition of the northern area as gradient for tracers? Also western is set as a gradient instead of close ...
- Tue May 12, 2020 7:19 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Adjoint model blow up
- Replies: 13
- Views: 28037
Re: Adjoint model blow up
I would suggest use Cha for zeta (no Che) Fla for 2d momentum (no Sch) Cla for all 3d value including Nonlinear model use also Same mixing/viscosity coefficient for NLM ADM. I saw zero bottom drag coefficient in your ocean.in. Is there a reason for 0 ? I don't know the reason but I suspect that the ...
- Sat Sep 21, 2019 1:59 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Assimilation of SSH
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1686
Assimilation of SSH
Hello everyone,
In ROMS 4dvar, we can assimilate the observed ssha to the model. When assimilate the ssha, I was wondering how assimilated ssha influence the other variable such as temperature and salinity? I was trying to find the code regarding this issue, but I couldn't.
-Joonho
In ROMS 4dvar, we can assimilate the observed ssha to the model. When assimilate the ssha, I was wondering how assimilated ssha influence the other variable such as temperature and salinity? I was trying to find the code regarding this issue, but I couldn't.
-Joonho
- Mon Nov 12, 2018 6:27 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Temperature significantly near land areas
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3654
Re: Temperature significantly near land areas
I think your set up for boundary condition is not common set up.
Why don't you give below boundary condition and see if the result change.
For free surface, Chapman
2d momentum(Ubar, Vbar), Flather
3d momentum(Uvel, Vvel), Clamp
MTKE, Gradient
Tvar (TS), Clamp
-JH
Why don't you give below boundary condition and see if the result change.
For free surface, Chapman
2d momentum(Ubar, Vbar), Flather
3d momentum(Uvel, Vvel), Clamp
MTKE, Gradient
Tvar (TS), Clamp
-JH
- Fri Nov 09, 2018 3:09 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Error compiling ROMS with new flag SINGLE_PRECISION (svn928)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10338
Re: Error compiling ROMS with new flag SINGLE_PRECISION (svn
Thank you for your answer Dr.Arango. I've got more question. You mentioned that If the 1D variable arguement to mp_bcastf is singe precison, it will usee routine mpbcastf_1d in distribute.F. But my understanding looking at the code is if the single precision is defined, ROMS will use mp_bacastf_1dp ...
- Wed Nov 07, 2018 1:11 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Error compiling ROMS with new flag SINGLE_PRECISION (svn928)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10338
Re: Error compiling ROMS with new flag SINGLE_PRECISION (svn
Thank you for your report. I also faced with same situation as you mentioned and was about to report.
- Thu Aug 30, 2018 8:25 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: ROMS blows up "DIAG speed trouble"
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4271
Re: ROMS blows up "DIAG speed trouble"
First of all, check out the barotropic time step as Kate mentioned above. Secondly, I saw several weird option with your boundary condition. I saw gradient condition for temp and salt at the northern boundary. For West, I saw gradient condition for temp and salt(Not closed). I was wondering whether ...
- Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:35 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: AVERAGES_DETIDES result problem
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21403
Re: AVERAGES_DETIDES result problem
Regarding this issue,
please give definition to your tide file with all available point when you build a tide file(say u,v,rho,psi dimension).
-JH
please give definition to your tide file with all available point when you build a tide file(say u,v,rho,psi dimension).
-JH
- Tue Nov 28, 2017 5:00 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: unrealistic pressure gradient forming along bathymetry
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13329
Re: unrealistic pressure gradient forming along bathymetry
Would you show us the log file?
-JH
-JH
- Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:20 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Blow up ROMS model.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3426
Re: Blow up ROMS model.
Kates's FAQ would be helpful to you.
For me, I would save every snapshot as possible as I can(here give NHIS==1), and then I plot every field
along all levels. You will find something.
-JH
For me, I would save every snapshot as possible as I can(here give NHIS==1), and then I plot every field
along all levels. You will find something.
-JH
- Sat Aug 27, 2016 12:24 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Temperature Difference from ROMS to HYCOM
- Replies: 9
- Views: 13717
Re: Temperature Difference from ROMS to HYCOM
For your information, you'd better run the PGE test with homogeneous(no stratification).
- Mon Aug 01, 2016 6:07 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: sponge layer
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3414
Re: sponge layer
Hi,
The name in the code 'fac' means factor.
Therefore fac determines that the largest value of the viscosity(or diffusivity) in your model boundary.
For example, if you set 4.0_r8 and your viscosity is 10 m2/s(in ocean.in), you will have maximum 40 m2/s along your model boundary.
-JH
The name in the code 'fac' means factor.
Therefore fac determines that the largest value of the viscosity(or diffusivity) in your model boundary.
For example, if you set 4.0_r8 and your viscosity is 10 m2/s(in ocean.in), you will have maximum 40 m2/s along your model boundary.
-JH
- Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:03 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: MAIN: Abnormal termination: BLOWUP.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 17089
Re: MAIN: Abnormal termination: BLOWUP.
Oh! I saw wrong log file(I should have read third one). Sorry for the wrong post. Yes, like Kate mentioned, I also recommend you to try shorter time step. I also have a question about your boundary condition. As far as I know, the conventional boundary condition for the sea surface and barotropic ...
- Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:47 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: MAIN: Abnormal termination: BLOWUP.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 17089
Re: MAIN: Abnormal termination: BLOWUP.
Hi,
You are not allowed to have zero value in your depth.
Check out more information on the below website.
https://myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php? ... w=previous
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2546
You are not allowed to have zero value in your depth.
Check out more information on the below website.
https://myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php? ... w=previous
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2546
- Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:16 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Model crashing at a certain baroclinic time step
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3231
Re: Model crashing at a certain baroclinic time step
What is your minimum depth?
What if you run the model without WET_DRY?
What if you run the model without WET_DRY?
- Tue Jan 26, 2016 6:52 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Early blowing of model simulation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3783
Re: Early blowing of model simulation
My suggestions are
1.Try different horizontal advection scheme (say U3 instead of C4)
2.Try quadratic drag instead of linear drag(UV_QDRAG instead of UV_LDRAG)
3.Try different vertical turbulent scheme(say LMD or MY2.5 instead of GLS)
-JH
1.Try different horizontal advection scheme (say U3 instead of C4)
2.Try quadratic drag instead of linear drag(UV_QDRAG instead of UV_LDRAG)
3.Try different vertical turbulent scheme(say LMD or MY2.5 instead of GLS)
-JH
- Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:53 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Unrealisitic thickness of mixed layer
- Replies: 15
- Views: 22563
Re: Unrealisitic thickness of mixed layer
Minor stuff: I guess you are using 4 times daily surface forcing and I don't think you need to use diurnal srflux in your cpp. Wind data is critical for your mixed layer depth calculation as Duran mentioned above. BTW, is your SST reasonable compare with OBS? My suggestion is 1. Use Akima 4th order ...
- Sat Jan 09, 2016 10:57 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Currents unrealistically fast
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7108
Re: Currents unrealistically fast
Would you show us the log file? Right now I doubted the vertical turbulence model, K-epsilon which is pretty sensitive. My recommandation is that use different mixing (say, K-kl, k-w). Log file can give us more information about the causes of blowing up.
-JH
-JH
- Wed Dec 30, 2015 10:53 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Issue with thermocline in ROMS output
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3919
Re: Issue with thermocline in ROMS output
Check out the cyclone strength(Zonal and Meridonal wind) from WRF output and see if it's reasonable. You are giving very large bottom drag coefficient now. I was wondering whether this large value influence the thermocline depth. Try different vertical turbulent closure(say MY2.5, GLS) What is the ...
- Sun Dec 13, 2015 4:58 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Issue with thermocline in ROMS output
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3919
Re: Issue with thermocline in ROMS output
How did you give the surface forcing time interval(here, wind will be the critical factor)?
What are the horizontal and vertical resolutions?
Which scheme did you use for the vertical turbulent closure? (say, MY2.5, LMD, GLS, etc)
What are the horizontal and vertical resolutions?
Which scheme did you use for the vertical turbulent closure? (say, MY2.5, LMD, GLS, etc)
- Wed Nov 11, 2015 7:11 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: model blow-up due to abnormal velocity
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9993
Re: model blow-up due to abnormal velocity
1. What if you run the model without tide? Does it still blow up?
2. What if you reduce the time step? Say, half from current time step.
-JH
2. What if you reduce the time step? Say, half from current time step.
-JH
- Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:52 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Can't run my IS4D-Var case Gnorm = NaN
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10351
Re: Can't run my IS4D-Var case Gnorm = NaN
I checked out the log file you attached several times but it is difficult to diagnose the causes of NaN value.
By the way, your Haney(rfactor) and Beckman & Haidvogel number is quiet high compare with known value(say, rfactor < 0.2) which means you did not smooth the bottom topography much.
By the way, your Haney(rfactor) and Beckman & Haidvogel number is quiet high compare with known value(say, rfactor < 0.2) which means you did not smooth the bottom topography much.
- Mon Sep 28, 2015 4:08 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Can't run my IS4D-Var case Gnorm = NaN
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10351
Re: Can't run my IS4D-Var case Gnorm = NaN
Also, I noticed that, when the model only includes the SLA data or the SST data in the observation file, the model rejected most of them, but if the model includes both the SLA data and the SST data, all the observation data can be accepted by the model. For above situation, try to use super ...
- Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:58 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Can't run my IS4D-Var case Gnorm = NaN
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10351
Re: Can't run my IS4D-Var case Gnorm = NaN
I've never done SANITY_CHECK before. But I compiled with SANITY_CHECK and faced with same error message as you noted above(with gfortran). Maybe code developer can helped this out to solve the problem. I saw the log file you attached and found TLM increments are zero even though ROMS continuing the ...
- Sun Sep 27, 2015 7:45 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Can't run my IS4D-Var case Gnorm = NaN
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10351
Re: Can't run my IS4D-Var case Gnorm = NaN
Hi,
Does your domain include equator?
If it's ok for you, I want to see your model domain.
-JH
Does your domain include equator?
If it's ok for you, I want to see your model domain.
-JH
- Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:11 pm
- Forum: ROMS Wish List
- Topic: Wish list
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10633
Re: Wish list
Ok, Dr.Arango. I will retry that model again. Thank you for your reply.
-JH
-JH
- Mon May 04, 2015 7:13 am
- Forum: ROMS Wish List
- Topic: Wish list
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10633
Wish list
Dear ROMS developers, I know that there are lots of to do list ahead of you, but I'd like to add one more wish list. I'm currently using a two way nesting in ROMS and this is very useful and powerful tool to see the regional phenomena with one time calculation. While running the model, I'm also ...
- Sat Mar 21, 2015 10:21 am
- Forum: ROMS Ecosystem
- Topic: Nesting about NPZD model
- Replies: 0
- Views: 8280
Nesting about NPZD model
Dear Developers,
I have a simple question.
Can ROMS simulate bio-physical (like NPZD model) using two way coupling?
-JH
I have a simple question.
Can ROMS simulate bio-physical (like NPZD model) using two way coupling?
-JH
- Sat Mar 21, 2015 10:17 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Question about Nesting
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2535
Question about Nesting
Dear developers and users, In nesting application, if I want to use triply nested refiment grid and one additional nested grid (just like below figure) what should be the NestLayers and GridsInLayer be like? I read users should set NestLayers = 3 GridsInLayer = 1 2 1 in the ROMS wiki. https://www ...
- Thu Mar 19, 2015 5:13 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: About chlolophyll in NPZD model
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5444
Re: About chlolophyll in NPZD model
Kunal & Zhang,
Thank you for your reply.
I know that the Fennel type bio model has a Chlorophyll variable. But I just want to start the bio-physical model as simple as possible.
Thanks for the reference.
Best,
-JH
Thank you for your reply.
I know that the Fennel type bio model has a Chlorophyll variable. But I just want to start the bio-physical model as simple as possible.
Thanks for the reference.
Best,
-JH
- Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:03 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: 'zeta' in ROMS
- Replies: 9
- Views: 75146
Re: 'zeta' in ROMS
Hi Luke,
How can I get the matlab script?
Sould I contact to Willis or
Would you send the script to my e-mail or upload to this post?
ocean0510@gmail.com
-JH
How can I get the matlab script?
Sould I contact to Willis or
Would you send the script to my e-mail or upload to this post?
ocean0510@gmail.com
-JH
- Tue Mar 10, 2015 12:08 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: 'zeta' in ROMS
- Replies: 9
- Views: 75146
Re: 'zeta' in ROMS
I also agree with Luke's opinion.
I have been trying to find a way to remove the steric signal from SSH.
But since I'm a novice user of ROMS, I do not know how to do it.
Are there any recommendation or tips to do it?
Any answer would be appreciated.
JH
I have been trying to find a way to remove the steric signal from SSH.
But since I'm a novice user of ROMS, I do not know how to do it.
Are there any recommendation or tips to do it?
Any answer would be appreciated.
JH
- Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:52 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: About chlolophyll in NPZD model
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5444
About chlolophyll in NPZD model
Dear ROMS Users,
I am trying to calculates chlolophyll concentration from the output of NPZD model.
I was wondering how can I calculate the chlolophyll concentration.
Would you show me the way how to calculate the chlolophyll?
Formulae or matlab mfile would be very helpful.
Thank you.
-JH
I am trying to calculates chlolophyll concentration from the output of NPZD model.
I was wondering how can I calculate the chlolophyll concentration.
Would you show me the way how to calculate the chlolophyll?
Formulae or matlab mfile would be very helpful.
Thank you.
-JH
- Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:52 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: About imposing Holland Model in ROMS on an idealized domain
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2895
Re: About imposing Holland Model in ROMS on an idealized dom
Did you run the model without tide?
Did you run the model without holland wind input and put constant or 0 wind?
-JH
Did you run the model without holland wind input and put constant or 0 wind?
-JH
- Tue Dec 16, 2014 5:43 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: Question about Sea level
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12734
Re: Question about Sea level
Hi Dr.Arango, Thank you very much for your reply. Domain averaged volume can get through the log file from ROMS, right? I can't log in the computer for some reason, right now. I will plot domain volume with a time series as soon as I reach there. By the way, I also ran the model with same domain and ...
- Mon Dec 15, 2014 4:21 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: humidity in Bulk flux.F
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4514
Re: humidity in Bulk flux.F
Yes. It looks reasonable kludge. Thank you for your post, Dr.Lanerolle. The original ROMS code in bulk_flux.F cff=(0.7859_r8+0.03477_r8*TairC(i))/ & & (1.0_r8+0.00412_r8*TairC(i)) e_sat=10.0_r8**cff ! saturation vapor pressure (hPa or mbar) vap_p=e_sat*RH ! water vapor pressure (hPa or mbar) cff2 ...
- Sun Dec 14, 2014 5:00 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: humidity in Bulk flux.F
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4514
humidity in Bulk flux.F
ROMS can get either specific or relative humidity as a forcing input. And ROMS has three ways to calculate longwave radiation. When we calculate net longwave radiation internally (with LONGWAVE defined) ROMS requests humidity(RH, 412 line in bulk_flux.F) and this time ROMS does not know wheather ...
- Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:34 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: Question about Sea level
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12734
Re: Question about Sea level
Maybe my question was too naive and also I did not understand the theory well. So I change my question. In Pacific basin, I ran ROMS for decadal order. The forcing is derived from AR4 and AR5(IPCC). After I finished the calculation, I saw the zeta in ROMS was becoming larger as time went by. First ...
- Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:44 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: Question about Sea level
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12734
Re: Question about Sea level
As far as I know, ROMS is a Bousnessq approximated model which the desnsity field is fixed.
But as Dr.Arango mentioned, the zeta in ROMS seems varying with respect to density variation.
How do I understand about the zeta in ROMS?
But as Dr.Arango mentioned, the zeta in ROMS seems varying with respect to density variation.
How do I understand about the zeta in ROMS?
- Wed Oct 22, 2014 2:43 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: decreasing trend in bottom layer salinity ...
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4581
Re: decreasing trend in bottom layer salinity ...
Can I see your domain and the area problem occuring? Is it far from the boundary?
Have you ever changed the RDRG2 value? Mine is (0.0025 and the many test cases in ROMS are 0.003)
-JH
Have you ever changed the RDRG2 value? Mine is (0.0025 and the many test cases in ROMS are 0.003)
-JH
- Fri May 16, 2014 3:02 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: lower temp, salt value at open east bounday move in domain
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2906
Re: lower temp, salt value at open east bounday move in doma
Why don't you switch off the M2NUDGING?
How did you set the TNUD, M3NUD and OBCFACTOR in ocean.in file?
This one is little different issue but does it work LONGWAVE_OUT with undefined BULK_FLUX?
It may not harm the lateral boundary value but I'm just curious.
-JH
How did you set the TNUD, M3NUD and OBCFACTOR in ocean.in file?
This one is little different issue but does it work LONGWAVE_OUT with undefined BULK_FLUX?
It may not harm the lateral boundary value but I'm just curious.
-JH
- Fri May 09, 2014 4:00 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: 'zeta' in ROMS
- Replies: 9
- Views: 75146
Re: 'zeta' in ROMS
Dear code developer and users, Recently I was told that there is a branch of ROMS which can add steric effect. That model is developed by Song and it is not a open source code. These days the climate variability is becoming more important and I think that it is necessary to consider the steric ...
- Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:05 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Circumpolar grid
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5377
Re: Circumpolar grid
I sincerely appreciate your file.
It will be very helpful.
Thank you so much.
Best,
-JH
It will be very helpful.
Thank you so much.
Best,
-JH
- Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:49 pm
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Circumpolar grid
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5377
Re: Circumpolar grid
Hi,
Is there a toolbox to generate attached figure like domain?
Is there a toolbox to generate attached figure like domain?
- Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:51 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: river salinity overshoot
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13126
Re: river salinity overshoot
1. What about the depth from the river source point to the river mouth?
Does it vary?
2. How about change the river starting point?(ie. masking above the curving point and starting from it)
Does it vary?
2. How about change the river starting point?(ie. masking above the curving point and starting from it)
- Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:24 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: river salinity overshoot
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13126
Re: river salinity overshoot
Well, actually I experienced that kind of problem many moons ago. 1. At that time I was giving only salinity on and the problem was fixed when I give both temperature and salinity on. But in your case, you already tried that before right? 2. Is your model including tide? If so, what happen if you ...
- Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:31 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: river salinity overshoot
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13126
Re: river salinity overshoot
What happen if you give sources at whole vertical layer?
- Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:13 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Problem with the river discharge
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7410
Re: Problem with the river discharge
I believe that you have used the climatological monthly windstress data.
Why don't you use daily mean or 6 hourly wind data?
I'm sure that you will get a better result.
-JH
Why don't you use daily mean or 6 hourly wind data?
I'm sure that you will get a better result.
-JH
- Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:30 am
- Forum: ROMS Results
- Topic: cuase of the temperature rise
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10524
Re: cuase of the temperature rise
Hi, Kate. Thanks for the reply.
My ROMS case is calculating the heat flux via the bulk formulae.
Attached figures are the yearly mean, surface and bottom level avergaged temperature variation for 41 years.
The model domain is North pacific basin (E98~W76, S20~N65).
My ROMS case is calculating the heat flux via the bulk formulae.
Attached figures are the yearly mean, surface and bottom level avergaged temperature variation for 41 years.
The model domain is North pacific basin (E98~W76, S20~N65).
- Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:56 am
- Forum: ROMS Results
- Topic: cuase of the temperature rise
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10524
cuase of the temperature rise
Dear users, In the climatology run, either using Levitus T,S data or longterm averaged value from OGCM (SODA, ECCO) for the ocean initial state and COADS or the ECMWF mean data for the surface forcing, I found that the temperature sharply rises on first year in most cases. And also many literature ...
- Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:57 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Grid generator
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3635
Re: Grid generator
Hi Kate,
Thank you for your reply and the useful paper link.
I want to see the result of the differences between the regional (Pacific ocean) which used different model boundary condition and the Global ocean model that has no boundary condition.
-JH
Thank you for your reply and the useful paper link.
I want to see the result of the differences between the regional (Pacific ocean) which used different model boundary condition and the Global ocean model that has no boundary condition.
-JH
- Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:45 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Grid generator
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3635
Grid generator
Dear Users,
Are there any grid generator program which is useful for the global domain?
-JH
Are there any grid generator program which is useful for the global domain?
-JH
- Wed May 02, 2012 2:47 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: model blows up when using bulk forcing..
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6231
Re: model blows up when using bulk forcing..
Did you fix the problem?
I've just noticed that there is no boundary condition for M3 in your application.
I would recommend you to check out the current right before the model blow up.
Cheers,
-JH
I've just noticed that there is no boundary condition for M3 in your application.
I would recommend you to check out the current right before the model blow up.
Cheers,
-JH
- Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:28 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Problem with an assimilation of temperature
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2500
Problem with an assimilation of temperature
Dear users, I had run a model with using 4Dvar data assimilation. Temperature and salinity profile are used to assimilate. I ran 2 cases, January and August. Assimilated temperature on January seems pretty reasonable compare with obs data but the problem occurs on August. The temperature in August ...
- Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:29 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: About minimum depth
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10572
Re: About minimum depth
Thank you for your detailed comment and adding an entry of WikiROMS.
That is kind of you to do so.
And I'm sure that users can get this fundamental information via the WikiROMS.
Regards,
-JH
That is kind of you to do so.
And I'm sure that users can get this fundamental information via the WikiROMS.
Regards,
-JH
- Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:24 pm
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: About minimum depth
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10572
Re: About minimum depth
Thnank you for your reply, Dr. Arango. Good clue.
So, we have to set non-zero value as a minimum depth in order not to make the vertical level thickness zero.
-JH
So, we have to set non-zero value as a minimum depth in order not to make the vertical level thickness zero.
-JH
- Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:44 pm
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: About minimum depth
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10572
About minimum depth
Dear ROMS users,
I was wondering why we set minimum depth in ROMS ?
I was wondering why we set minimum depth in ROMS ?
- Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:58 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Problems reading climatological files
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6646
Re: Problems reading climatological files
Hi,
Did you check out the variables in varinfo.dat file whether they matches
with the variables in your climatology file?
Did you check out the variables in varinfo.dat file whether they matches
with the variables in your climatology file?
- Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:17 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Problem with model start
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5116
Re: Problem with model start
Thank you for your reply, Kate. Yes, you are exatly right about what you said. The problem occurred what I put the number of forcingfile did not match what really exist. My mistake. Now I've learned more about how to find a solution from error. I appreciate your instruction Kate. Thank you very much ...
- Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:26 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Problem with model start
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5116
Re: Problem with model start
Thank you for your reply, Kate. 3007 !----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3008 ! Load I/O information into structure. 3009 !----------------------------------------------------------------------- In inp_par.f90. There is Load I/O section. 3044 ! Initialize and ...
- Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:18 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Problem with model start
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5116
Re: Problem with model start
Hi Kate, Thank you for your reply. With debugger, I got below message. Model Input Parameters: ROMS/TOMS version 3.5 Thursday - July 21, 2011 - 10:13:41 AM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0: Subscript out of range for array s%files (inp_par.f90: 3063 ...
- Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:02 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Problem with model start
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5116
Problem with model start
Dear ROMS users, I encountered this problem only with specific case. I ran same domain with three different dimension in new pc, Quad core, 16GB RAM, SUSE 11.2, 3.6.3 netcdf, PGI fortran, mpich2-1.2.1, svn 564. case 1 dimension 88*96*20 case 2 dimension 177*194*20 case 3 dimension 292*332*20 The ...
- Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:22 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: nested grids
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5177
Re: nested grids
There are two more. One from UCLA and the other from AGRIF.
As far as I know, AGRIF can do two way nesting.
Check this out.
http://roms.mpl.ird.fr/
As far as I know, AGRIF can do two way nesting.
Check this out.
http://roms.mpl.ird.fr/
- Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:10 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Simple question about conversion factor
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8584
Re: Simple question about conversion factor
Then the monthly ERA-40 data is probably averaged value from 6 hourly data.
Thank you very much for your replies.
-JH
Thank you very much for your replies.
-JH
- Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:04 pm
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Simple question about conversion factor
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8584
Re: Simple question about conversion factor
Hi back, Thank you for your note. I tried to search in google and got an answer like below. http://stommel.tamu.edu/~baum/ecmwf.html 2. The "Surface solar radiation" in "W m**-2 s" needs to be converted into a "shortwave radiation flux" in "W m**-2". shortwave radiation flux (W/m^2) = surface solar ...
- Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:18 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Simple question about conversion factor
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8584
Re: Simple question about conversion factor
Any suggestion, please?
- Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:17 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Simple question about conversion factor
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8584
Simple question about conversion factor
Hi,
I'm trying to use ERA40 forcing. The solar radiation unit is w/m^2/s.
I need to convert this to w/m^2 which is unit for ROMS.
What should I do?
Sorry for asking basic question.
-JH
I'm trying to use ERA40 forcing. The solar radiation unit is w/m^2/s.
I need to convert this to w/m^2 which is unit for ROMS.
What should I do?
Sorry for asking basic question.
-JH
- Sun May 22, 2011 3:28 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: nesting grids
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4547
Re: nesting grids
Are there any specific reasons why you want to use tide information from
large domain result?
-JH
large domain result?
-JH
- Sat May 21, 2011 2:15 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: unexpected temperature distribution ...
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5213
Re: unexpected temperature distribution ...
Before you think about the wrong use of horizontal/vertical diffusion cpp option,
did you check out the value of surface forcing whether it's reasonable?
Sometimes we find some weird value in the forcing file due to mistake
from the building script.
did you check out the value of surface forcing whether it's reasonable?
Sometimes we find some weird value in the forcing file due to mistake
from the building script.
- Sat May 21, 2011 12:54 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: unexpected temperature distribution ...
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5213
Re: unexpected temperature distribution ...
I can't see the images.
Would you attach them?
Would you attach them?
- Fri May 13, 2011 1:48 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: model blowing up at exact the same model time!!!why??
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5750
Re: model blowing up at exact the same model time!!!why??
I mixed up with your answer. I edited my answer.
So, both of your model(large and nested domain) are initialized with climatology T and S? And the nested domain blows up? Can I see figures of your horizontal and vertical
speed at the blowing time?
So, both of your model(large and nested domain) are initialized with climatology T and S? And the nested domain blows up? Can I see figures of your horizontal and vertical
speed at the blowing time?
- Fri May 13, 2011 1:08 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: model blowing up at exact the same model time!!!why??
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5750
Re: model blowing up at exact the same model time!!!why??
Are you doing one-way nesting ?
If so, is your initial file also from larger domain?
If so, is your initial file also from larger domain?
- Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:37 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: Question about Pair
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13350
Re: Question about Pair
Thank you for your answer, Mr.Warner. I downloaded sea level pressure and surface pressure from NCEP reanalysis version 1. I plotted same time step of both dataset(see attached) The general features of the ocean looks about the same although there is a small wave like motion in the surface pressure ...
- Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:59 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: Question about Pair
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13350
Re: Question about Pair
Thank you for your reply, Mr.Hadfield.
So, if I can get the sea level pressure, then I'd better use it.
But if I can not get the sea level pressure, I can also use the surface pressure (or surface air
pressure) as an alternative since it is expected showing negligible effect.
So, if I can get the sea level pressure, then I'd better use it.
But if I can not get the sea level pressure, I can also use the surface pressure (or surface air
pressure) as an alternative since it is expected showing negligible effect.
- Sat Mar 26, 2011 3:54 pm
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: Question about Pair
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13350
Question about Pair
Dear Users,
There are two different surface pressure variable from atmospheric model such as NCEP.
The one is surface pressure and the other is sea level pressure.
I was wondering which one should I use when I use 'Pair' in the bulk formulae.
Regards,
-Peter
There are two different surface pressure variable from atmospheric model such as NCEP.
The one is surface pressure and the other is sea level pressure.
I was wondering which one should I use when I use 'Pair' in the bulk formulae.
Regards,
-Peter
- Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:05 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Backwards trajectory
- Replies: 7
- Views: 13924
Re: Backwards trajectory
Thanks for your message and link, David.
I'll follow your suggestion.
Regads,
-JH
I'll follow your suggestion.
Regads,
-JH
- Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:45 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Backwards trajectory
- Replies: 7
- Views: 13924
Re: Backwards trajectory
Thanks for your notes, Ivica and Rodrigo.
So, I've got two options.
1. Modify the step_floats.F and interp_floats.F. and run the ADJOINT model with using floats.
2. Use history file to trace back.
So, I've got two options.
1. Modify the step_floats.F and interp_floats.F. and run the ADJOINT model with using floats.
2. Use history file to trace back.
- Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:38 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Backwards trajectory
- Replies: 7
- Views: 13924
Backwards trajectory
Dear ROMS users,
I was wondering whether ROMS can track back the orginal source place using adjoint model with floats?
-JH
I was wondering whether ROMS can track back the orginal source place using adjoint model with floats?
-JH
- Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:16 pm
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Error msg from d_ssh_obs.m
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2366
Error msg from d_ssh_obs.m
Hi folks, I've encountered a problem when I use d_ssh_obs.m First of all, when I executed d_sst_obs.m, there was no any problem. But when I executed d_ssh_obs.m, it gave me the below error message. h has the following dimensions (input order): 1) eta_rho = 55 2) xi_rho = 56 h loaded into an array of ...
- Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:52 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: compile problem in R4DVAR
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12622
Re: compile problem in R4DVAR
Hi, Dr. Arango. Thank you for your reply.
At first, I used original(wrong) ARPACK but later I used a right one which you are describing above (I wrote about that).
You are right about the mpif.h. It does not exist in the original ARPACK library.
Thank you for your note.
-JH
At first, I used original(wrong) ARPACK but later I used a right one which you are describing above (I wrote about that).
You are right about the mpif.h. It does not exist in the original ARPACK library.
Thank you for your note.
-JH
- Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:38 pm
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: compile problem in R4DVAR
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12622
Re: compile problem in R4DVAR
I'm back to here to report the solution which I was stuck in before. I was trying to run the example, WC13 from recent assimilation Workshop. Thanks to the detailed explanation, I was able to run the I4DVAR. To run the I4DVAR, one need to compile the ARPACK tools before they run the model. I ...
- Mon Jan 03, 2011 2:46 pm
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: compile problem in R4DVAR
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12622
compile problem in R4DVAR
Hi all, I have encountered the compiling error when I tried to use the R4DVAR. I used build.bash and got below result /opt/mpich2/bin/mpif90 -O3 -tp core2-64 /home/ocean/model/trunk32/project/WC13/R4DVAR/Build/esmf_roms.o /home/ocean/model/trunk32/project/WC13/R4DVAR/Build/master.o /home/ocean/model ...
- Sat Sep 25, 2010 12:05 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Intel’s new i7 980x CPU gives disappointing speedup
- Replies: 48
- Views: 111535
Re: Intel’s new i7 980x CPU gives disappointing speedup
Hi Mr.Ban, Did you fix the problem ? I had faced with similar problem which you mentioned above. Recently, I tried with updated ROMS svn 514 and it shows better performance than previous ROMS version. Dr.Arango amended some bugs with parrallel and I believe that the amending brought better result ...
- Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:12 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: unrealistic high temperature near the Changjiang estuary
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6768
Re: unrealistic high temperature near the Changjiang estuary
I had faced with similar situation before. I gave only salinity at that time. It was solved with both temperature and salinity on with my river forcing. See this disscussion, https://www.myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=867&hilit=susonic Now I don't have a good solution but I doubt whether you ...
- Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:58 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: unrealistic high temperature near the Changjiang estuary
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6768
Re: unrealistic high temperature near the Changjiang estuary
Hi,
Did you give salinity only to the river forcing file or both temperature and salinity?
-Peter
Did you give salinity only to the river forcing file or both temperature and salinity?
-Peter
- Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:18 pm
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: About linear programing with bathymetry smoothing
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6083
About linear programing with bathymetry smoothing
Dear users, I was able to see the Dr. Arango's presentation at the latest ROMS workshop. In that ppt file, there is a slide which compares about the bathymetry smoothing methods. And I was wondering whether users can get the linear programing method for the bathymetry smoothing through downloading ...
- Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:28 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: Question about Sea level
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12734
Question about Sea level
Dear ROMS Users,
I have a simple question.
Does ROMS calculate sea level variation with respect to the temperature variation?
If it does, would you point out where the code is?
Thanks in advance,
-Peter
I have a simple question.
Does ROMS calculate sea level variation with respect to the temperature variation?
If it does, would you point out where the code is?
Thanks in advance,
-Peter
- Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:45 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: question about streamfunction
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8794
question about streamfunction
Dear Users,
What should I do if I want to write the streamfunction?
Thanks in advance
-Joonho
What should I do if I want to write the streamfunction?
Thanks in advance
-Joonho
- Fri Jul 02, 2010 5:19 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: question about plotting
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6121
question about plotting
Dear Users, I have some problem with plotting. The ncl was successfully complied but I got an error message when I run the idt gmeta. The error message is, 'reading stdout of translator: Resource temporarily unavailable. Translator aborted' Have you ever seen this message? and if so, what would be ...
- Sat May 22, 2010 3:00 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: unrealistic boundary current when modeling internal tide
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8011
Re: unrealistic boundary current when modeling internal tide
Have you ever tried to run the model without tidal forcing under same condition?
- Sat May 01, 2010 5:45 am
- Forum: ROMS Results
- Topic: problem with perfect restart
- Replies: 13
- Views: 23789
Re: problem with perfect restart
Hi, Kate. Thanks for the reply. My rst file size is only 504mb when it stops. I just came to know that it's concerned with vertical mixing scheme. When I ran the model with LMD and PERFECT_RESTART activated, it couldn't save more than 3 step. However, when I define different vertical mixing scheme ...
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:43 am
- Forum: ROMS Results
- Topic: problem with perfect restart
- Replies: 13
- Views: 23789
problem with perfect restart
Hi all, I found possible bug with perfect restart option in ROMS. without perfect restart option, we can write restart nc file continusouly(say up to 5th or 10th). But with defining perfect restart option, ROMS cannot write more than 3 step in rst nc file. The error message is 'WRT_RST - error while ...
- Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:20 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: problems with the addition of tide forcing
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6995
Re: problems with the addition of tide forcing
CHECKDEFS - no bottom stress formulation is selected. See above error message. You need to give the formulation which caculates the bottom stress. In ROMS, we have logarithmic, Linear and Quadratic bottom friction formulation. Those are UV_LOGDRAG, UV_LDRAG and UV_QDAG respectively in cppdefs.h ...
- Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:15 am
- Forum: ROMS Results
- Topic: some suggestion with history file and average file
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17997
Re: some suggestion with history file and average file
Thanks Shchepetkin and Kate, Storing 3D data in restart file can be an alternative solution but it is only a snapshot(not a average). And we don't have split option for the restart file as the history or average file does. So it will store all variables in one file which will give us one huge file ...
- Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:03 am
- Forum: ROMS Results
- Topic: some suggestion with history file and average file
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17997
Re: some suggestion with history file and average file
Hi Mathieu, Thanks for the reply. Sorry. I might give you a wrong idea. What I want to do is I want to store 2d variable(zeta, ubar,vbar) frequently(say hourly or daily) without 3d variable(temperature, salinity, u, v) on history file. And I want to store 3d vaiable with longer time step(say 10day ...
- Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:33 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Question about assimilation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3989
Question about assimilation
Dear ROMS users, I was told that ROMS is using a 4DVAR data assimilation scheme which takes 20 times longer than normal calculation. But I think that 3DVAR is also powerful and less cost effective. My question is Are there any plans that making ROMS also be capable of doing 3DVAR data assimilation ...
- Sun Apr 18, 2010 2:55 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Good fix for issue with Bulk Flux in ROMS
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8184
Re: Good fix for issue with Bulk Flux in ROMS
Hi Mr.Liu,
Thank you for your reply.
What do I need to do if I want to consider the sea ice effects?
Do you mean that I should turn on the ICESHELF cpp option if I want to consider sea ice effects?
Thanks in advance
-Peter
Thank you for your reply.
What do I need to do if I want to consider the sea ice effects?
Do you mean that I should turn on the ICESHELF cpp option if I want to consider sea ice effects?
Thanks in advance
-Peter
- Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:16 am
- Forum: ROMS Results
- Topic: some suggestion with history file and average file
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17997
some suggestion with history file and average file
Hi all, So far in ROMS we can store the variables on history file and average file with turning on/off the switches in ocean.in. And both output files are operated by only one switch. I think it would be better if we have each switches on each file(history and average respectively) so that we can ...
- Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:24 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Good fix for issue with Bulk Flux in ROMS
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8184
Re: Good fix for issue with Bulk Flux in ROMS
Dear ROMS users, I've got a same problem which Mr.Lanerolle had mentioned above. My domain is including the Okhotsk basin which is cold area and the air temperature goes down below -10 degree celcius in winter(especially on February). And then I got a unphysical sea surface temperature value which ...
- Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:35 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Q_PSOURE of River discharge?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7492
Re: Q_PSOURE of River discharge?
Check it out below address and download the first ppt.
http://www.myroms.org/index.php?page=ROMS_2005_agenda
-Peter
http://www.myroms.org/index.php?page=ROMS_2005_agenda
-Peter
- Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:00 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Tide open boundry?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8288
Re: Tide open boundry?
Hi, yang
please check out below address and download nobuhitomori's pdf file.
There is a boundary code information in that file.
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=930&p=4200#p4200
Hope that it helps to you.
-Peter
please check out below address and download nobuhitomori's pdf file.
There is a boundary code information in that file.
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=930&p=4200#p4200
Hope that it helps to you.
-Peter
- Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:52 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Q_PSOURE of River discharge?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7492
Re: Q_PSOURE of River discharge?
I believe that you'd better use #define UV_PSOURCE #define TS_PSOURCE or #define Q_PSOURCE #define TS_PSOURCE Detailed explanation is given in Warner's presentation in 2005 ROMS workshop. You can get a ppt file at below address. http://www.myroms.org/index.php?page=Workshops Hope it helps to you ...
- Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:33 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Question about srflx
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5430
Re: Question about srflx
Ah... I should have looked at the code carefully.
Thank you for the advices, prof. Wilkin.
Thank you for the advices, prof. Wilkin.
- Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:23 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Question about srflx
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5430
Re: Question about srflx
Thank you prof. Wilkin. You're very kind. Here is another question. The explanation which you linked to me is related with lmd mixing and Jerlov water type. Then, what if I want to use the other vertical mixing. Say, GLS vertical mixing scheme. My model result is telling me that different water type ...
- Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:50 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Question about srflx
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5430
Re: Question about srflx
Hi, Would you give me more information of the Jerlov water type. The water type 1 is representing the clearest water and 5 corresponding to the shortest penetration of solar radiation. This is all I know. Am I understanding right? Then, what is the criteria determining the water type? Any ...
- Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:21 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: model blow up
- Replies: 16
- Views: 11408
Re: model blow up
First of all, I doubt the cpp option. In cpp they are warning try not to use 'TS_SADVECTION' unless it's a shallow and high vertical resolution application. If it's not a solution, then what about changing the ROMS version? Say, go back to svn 390.
- Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:10 am
- Forum: ROMS Results
- Topic: diagnostic variable
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8784
diagnostic variable
Hi everyone,
It sounds basic stuff, but I was wondering which variable should I
use if I want to plot surface elevation gradient force and
baroclinic pressure gradient force term in the diagnostic file?
Thanks in advance
-Peter
It sounds basic stuff, but I was wondering which variable should I
use if I want to plot surface elevation gradient force and
baroclinic pressure gradient force term in the diagnostic file?
Thanks in advance
-Peter
- Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:31 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Final set of model constants for the GLS turbulence closures
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5083
Re: Final set of model constants for the GLS turbulence closures
Thanks for your quik reply, Dr. Warner. In your previous article which is right above my question, you mentioned this but i recommend to use the values in the ocean*.in files. and you just wrote that From the paper, the gls_cmuo value should be 0.5544 when used with the KC stability function for any ...
- Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:33 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Final set of model constants for the GLS turbulence closures
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5083
Re: Final set of model constants for the GLS turbulence closures
Hi Dr. Warner, I've got some questions about various GLS vertical mixing schemes. According to Warner et al(2005) on table no.2, 1. if I use k-epsilon with the Kantha and Clayson stability function, is nessasary to change the GLS_CMU0 value from 0.5477(ocean.in) to 0.5544(from the paper)? 2. What ...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:28 pm
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: Point source definitions
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17955
Re: Point source definitions
It took a while for me to fix the high/low temperature with point source erorr. Now, I think I don't get the weird value anymore. The solution is turn on both the temperature and salinity flag. I had been doing all the experiments with only salinity value defined because I didn't know the ...
- Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:07 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Passive tracer in river forcing
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2947
Passive tracer in river forcing
Dear ROMS users, I'm driving a regional model with a river source included. I want to use a passive tracer in order to visualize more about the distribution of the river plume. At first, I was able to add passive tracer in my initail and also boundary condition file. The model ran well and the ...
- Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:51 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Vertical mixing scheme in ROMS
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7953
Re: Vertical mixing scheme in ROMS
Hi ggerbi,
Thank you for your suggestion.
I'm running the model with time reduced(one third of the original time step). And now
it's woring without any problem.
It has still a little bit unstable speed near the boundary, though.
Again, thank you so much for your advice.
Best,
-Peter
Thank you for your suggestion.
I'm running the model with time reduced(one third of the original time step). And now
it's woring without any problem.
It has still a little bit unstable speed near the boundary, though.
Again, thank you so much for your advice.
Best,
-Peter
- Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:10 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Vertical mixing scheme in ROMS
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7953
Re: Vertical mixing scheme in ROMS
Hi Dr.Warner, I already tested my application with using LMD and MY 2.5 vertical scheme. It ran well without any problem. And I have just tested k-omega and gen vertical mixing and it also ran well without any problem. For the k-epsilon, my final history file gives me that there is an increasing ...
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:39 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Access to additional scalar variables.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4921
Re: Access to additional scalar variables.
Dear all,
I wanted to try to use the passive tracer in river forcing as mentioned above.
Would anyone help me out and give specific informations to me about
'add passive tracer in river forcing' ?
Thanks in advance,
-Peter
I wanted to try to use the passive tracer in river forcing as mentioned above.
Would anyone help me out and give specific informations to me about
'add passive tracer in river forcing' ?
Thanks in advance,
-Peter
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:35 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Vertical mixing scheme in ROMS
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7953
Vertical mixing scheme in ROMS
Hi, I'm trying to use GLS vertical mixing with k-epsilon. First of all, I ran under Kantha clayson with k-epsilon. It ran until 9th model day and blew up. Then I changed stability function to CANUTO_A. The model ran until 20th model day. I also changed the viscosity value. But it didn't help me out ...
- Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:18 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Access to additional scalar variables.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4921
Re: Access to additional scalar variables.
Hi Dr.Wilkins, I wanted to try to use the passive tracer. And I was able to add dye_01 in my initail condition and also boundary condition file. The model was run well. Now I want to run with passive tracer in my river forcing file. I have been searching out the answer for this question in ROMS ...
- Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:35 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Open Boundary Problem
- Replies: 20
- Views: 19651
Re: Open Boundary Problem
How often is your BC value given in your domain?
Have you ever changed the BC code from RADIATION to CLAMPED for M3 and T ?
From my experience, CLAMPED BC code might be more promising.
-Peter
Have you ever changed the BC code from RADIATION to CLAMPED for M3 and T ?
From my experience, CLAMPED BC code might be more promising.
-Peter
- Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:56 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: Question about the PASCAL compiler
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5484
Re: Question about the PASCAL compiler
Thank you for the answer, Schepet. That's valuable information for me.
And thank you, Gcreager. That's another important information. I'm going to try that one.
I really hope that this new opteron would get better.
Best,
-Peter
And thank you, Gcreager. That's another important information. I'm going to try that one.
I really hope that this new opteron would get better.
Best,
-Peter
- Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:10 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: Question about the PASCAL compiler
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5484
Re: Question about the PASCAL compiler
Thank you for the reply. I was able to find an information about PASCAL.
Yes like you said, it is not a fortran compiler.
Is there a way to improve the performance with this AMD based cpu?
Any suggestion would be appreciated.
Best,
-Peter
Yes like you said, it is not a fortran compiler.
Is there a way to improve the performance with this AMD based cpu?
Any suggestion would be appreciated.
Best,
-Peter
- Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:54 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: Question about the PASCAL compiler
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5484
Question about the PASCAL compiler
Hi all, Recently I had bought a new system which is based on AMD cpu. And I was wondering how fast it is. I had run under same condition such as same OS(SUSE 10.3), PGI compiler, same NETCDF version, same MPI, same SVN ROMS. But the new version of system did not show good performance. Therefore I ...
- Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:42 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Very slight bug in inp_par.F
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3601
Re: Very slight bug in inp_par.F
Hi, all
In set_data.F line 729, unnecessary parenthesis is included.
Check that one out please.
-Peter
In set_data.F line 729, unnecessary parenthesis is included.
Check that one out please.
-Peter
- Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:25 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Forcing in ROMS3.0
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6819
Re: Forcing in ROMS3.0
It seems that the error is about the same error which I experienced a couple of months ago with
eariler svn in ROMS 3.x.
Did you update with current svn ?
Try to check out current ROMS svn.
Maybe the number with current svn is 347.
eariler svn in ROMS 3.x.
Did you update with current svn ?
Try to check out current ROMS svn.
Maybe the number with current svn is 347.
- Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:11 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: Point source definitions
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17955
Re: Point source definitions
Thank you Kate and Warner. I'm running the model again under temperature "TRUE" and staion with river point. I'm also testing with same discharge but more river point source. We'll see what happens. I'll report the result soon. I took a few snapshot and attached. I just hope that this is what you ...
- Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:20 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: require netcdf for 64-bit platform!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9111
Re: require netcdf for 64-bit platform!
Thank you for your reply, crode and kate.
I'm going to try it again based on your information and will report the result here.
Best,
-Peter
I'm going to try it again based on your information and will report the result here.
Best,
-Peter
- Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:50 pm
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: Point source definitions
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17955
Re: Point source definitions
where are these points on the grid and which way is 'xi'? My domain is rotated so the xi direction would be rotated anticlockwise 40 degree from its original direction. And also if you see the above figure, named river_point, you can see the three blue points. Those are river flux points. Did you ...
- Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:59 pm
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: Point source definitions
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17955
Re: Point source definitions
What is the text on that line, and what is wrong? Well, it's not a big deal. I underlined the character in figure(see below). Even though I'm using a mpdata, I'm still getting weird value. This time, it has both hot water and cold water at the same time. Actually, I had run my model several time ...
- Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:16 pm
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: Point source definitions
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17955
Re: Point source definitions
Hi warner,
Thank you for your reply. I'm using default uv_advection scheme and u3h c4v for TS.
I attached again with png format.(sorrry and thanks)
I'm going to use the mpdata and will report the result here.
FYI, it has wrong spell in mpdata_diff.F on 19th line.
Regards,
Thank you for your reply. I'm using default uv_advection scheme and u3h c4v for TS.
I attached again with png format.(sorrry and thanks)
I'm going to use the mpdata and will report the result here.
FYI, it has wrong spell in mpdata_diff.F on 19th line.
Regards,
- Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:40 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: Point source definitions
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17955
Re: Point source definitions
Hi, all I'm trying to represent the river plume model which has a large discharge with uv_psource & ana_psource defined on cpp flag. The discharge varies 10000 upto 60000 ms-1. The size of delta x is approximately 11 km. At first, when I put the tidal forcing together with river, every thing was ...
- Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:46 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: require netcdf for 64-bit platform!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9111
Re: require netcdf for 64-bit platform!
Dera user,
I'm trying to install ROMS in NEC-SX system.
Is there a person who uses this system?
If so, would you show me a complie sctipt(sxf90 compiler)?
Please help me out.
Thanks in advance,
-Peter,
I'm trying to install ROMS in NEC-SX system.
Is there a person who uses this system?
If so, would you show me a complie sctipt(sxf90 compiler)?
Please help me out.
Thanks in advance,
-Peter,
- Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:34 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Question about the tidal forcing
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3541
Question about the tidal forcing
Hi all, While I was trying to add tidal forcing, I came to see that the ROMS is using both surface hieght and depth-averaged velocity boundary conditions in tidal forcing. I think that using both the height and velocity boundary conditions might lead into trouble due to the inconsistence between the ...
- Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:20 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: prognostic & diagnostic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7046
Re: prognostic & diagnostic
Hi, Mr.Arango. First of all, happy new year(sorry, it's kind of late greeting) Thank you so much for your clear explanation. It's a really specific information and also thank you for the link :D . It helped me out to understand better about those two method. Actually, I've been researching with ...
- Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:35 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: prognostic & diagnostic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7046
Re: prognostic & diagnostic
As far as I know in ROMS, if you want to do a prognostic running you need to run the model with undef xx_CLIMATOLOGY in contrast, if you want do a diagnostic running you need to run the model with define xx_CLIMATOLOGY in your header file. Am I right? Is there anyone who can tell me so that I can ...
- Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:35 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: prognostic & diagnostic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7046
prognostic & diagnostic
Hi all It might sound basic thing but I can't find a definition of prognostic run and diagnostic run. Is there anyone who can define those two methods and explain what should I do if I want to run by those two separate methods with ROMS? For example, turn on specific cpp flag. Thank you so much! Best
- Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:09 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Matlab version errors on ROMSTOOLS
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5997
Re: Matlab version errors on ROMSTOOLS
The first one is visualization tools and the second one is for both visualization and preprocessing
tools http://eros.eas.gatech.edu/RNT/ here is the direct address.
Best,
tools http://eros.eas.gatech.edu/RNT/ here is the direct address.
Best,
- Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:50 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Matlab version errors on ROMSTOOLS
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5997
- Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:03 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Matlab version errors on ROMSTOOLS
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5997
Re: Matlab version errors on ROMSTOOLS
Hi, there.
The tools which you are trying to use is from a different version of ROMS.
It's ROMS_Agrif from brest(France).
You'd better ask those questions
on http://roms.mpl.ird.fr/ which you downloaded the tools.
Good luck!
The tools which you are trying to use is from a different version of ROMS.
It's ROMS_Agrif from brest(France).
You'd better ask those questions
on http://roms.mpl.ird.fr/ which you downloaded the tools.
Good luck!
- Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:04 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: smflux using analytical expression
- Replies: 15
- Views: 12996
Re: smflux using analytical expression
Hi all. First of all, thanks to Arango's advice, finally I made a forcing file for representing certain typhoon with using Netcdf file. Well, I was poor at programming. But I'm sure that I learnt a lot throughout this opportunity. Anyways, I put wind stress and pressure as a forcing for typhoon. It ...
- Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:48 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Tidal effection with analytical expression
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3431
Re: Tidal effection with analytical expression
Thank you so much for your reply, Mr.Wilkin and Mr.Johnluick. And yes I will try to make a netcdf file to force the tide. Before that I wanted to use the analytical method(I drove just one boundary-thanks to Johnluick) and it works! Now I will try to make a netcdf file. And I have a question. How ...
- Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:53 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Tidal effection with analytical expression
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3431
Tidal effection with analytical expression
Hi all, I want to use tidal effect using analytical expression in my domain. Since my domain is too small to use large scale data such as TPXO6. So, I think it's better to use the ana_fsobc.h to make tadal effect. Hence I put this m2=0.757_r8 s2=0.337_r8 k1=0.245_r8 o1=0.177_r8 ttime=time(ng)+162.0 ...
- Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:43 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: smflux using analytical expression
- Replies: 15
- Views: 12996
Re: smflux using analytical expression
Hi arango, I'm still analyzing Netcdf file to make a forcing file for typhoon. :cry: But I think I can make the forcing file soon. :roll: Right now I'm trying to simulate the effect of typhoon in the ocean such as 'cold wake'. Would you let me know what I need to define in my cppflag ? The problem ...
- Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:21 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Inert Passive Tracer
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5847
Re: Inert Passive Tracer
Thank you Kate. That's very nice of you to upload here so that anyone who
is wondering about the function can downdload and use it.
Well I need to analyze the script which you uploaded and I will apply in my case.
Thanks again. Have a great day!
Regards,
-Peter
is wondering about the function can downdload and use it.
Well I need to analyze the script which you uploaded and I will apply in my case.
Thanks again. Have a great day!
Regards,
-Peter
- Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:05 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Meaning of 'BOUNDARY(ng)%'
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4373
Re: Meaning of 'BOUNDARY(ng)%'
Hi Kate,
I've got one more question to make sure I understood right or not.
So, does 'ng' mean each grid?
Best,
-Peter
I've got one more question to make sure I understood right or not.
So, does 'ng' mean each grid?
Best,
-Peter
- Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:46 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: smflux using analytical expression
- Replies: 15
- Views: 12996
Re: smflux using analytical expression
Hi Arango.
Thank you so much for your early reply. And I'm sorry for the lack of understanding
and also made you surprise.
I'll take your tips and promise that I'll try to study more about ROMS.
Regards,
-Peter
Thank you so much for your early reply. And I'm sorry for the lack of understanding
and also made you surprise.
I'll take your tips and promise that I'll try to study more about ROMS.
Regards,
-Peter
- Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:20 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: smflux using analytical expression
- Replies: 15
- Views: 12996
smflux using analytical expression
Hi all, I'm trying to force both wind and pressure by using an analytical expression. It works but I got a weird value in my output file. So, is there anyone who can check out what the problem is? I put like this # elif defined NWPACIFIC OPEN(103,file='pres001.p',status='old') DO j=JstrR,JendR read ...
- Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:08 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Inert Passive Tracer
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5847
Re: Inert Passive Tracer
Hi Kate. Thank you so much for your information. It really helps me to understand more about passive tracer. Would you mind if I request your file which has passive_tracer or matlab xxx.m file which is used for making passive boundary or initial file? Or your ana_passive.h file would be also great ...
- Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:16 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Inert Passive Tracer
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5847
Inert Passive Tracer
Hi all I'm trying to use inert passive tracer by ANA_PASSIVE. But I don't know for sure how to use it. Is there anyone who can give me an example file of ANA_PASSIVE so that I can reference it in my case. Right now I'm going to use those tracers as a diffusion of oil spill. ! Logical switches (TRUE ...
- Fri Sep 26, 2008 2:07 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Meaning of 'BOUNDARY(ng)%'
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4373
Re: Meaning of 'BOUNDARY(ng)%'
Thank you Kate. I really appreciate your reply.
Have a good weekend.
Have a good weekend.
- Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:34 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Meaning of 'BOUNDARY(ng)%'
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4373
Meaning of 'BOUNDARY(ng)%'
Hi all
I've been wondering that what does 'BOUNDARY(ng)%' mean?
Would you let me know that each of 'BOUNDARY' '(ng)' '%' meaning?
Best,
-Peter
I've been wondering that what does 'BOUNDARY(ng)%' mean?
Would you let me know that each of 'BOUNDARY' '(ng)' '%' meaning?
I appreciate any of your lessons.BOUNDARY(ng)%ubar_west(j)=my_flux/my_area
BOUNDARY(ng)%vbar_west(j)=0.0_r8
Best,
-Peter
- Mon Jun 09, 2008 10:46 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: compile in fedora 8 with intel fortran
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4802
Hi! linzhenhua Thank you for the reply. I just solved the error a few minutes ago. :lol: It was the exact right error which you mentioned. I was so naive about Linux system therefore I didn't know which netcdf I should download. (I just downloaded netcdf-3.6.2_linux64.tar.gz) And I got a wrong one ...
- Sun Jun 08, 2008 3:02 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: compile in fedora 8 with intel fortran
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4802
compile in fedora 8 with intel fortran
Hi~ I've just installed Linux fedora8 and set up Intel Fortran 10.1.015_x86_64 together with netcdf 3.6.2_x96_64 I also set up roms-3.0 However whenever I try to compile I got below message. What seems to be the problem? What else I should install more about Linux system. I don't know much about ...
- Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:50 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: How can I get ROMS 3.0
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3674
Thanks !
Thank you for your quik answer. I really appreciate that cecilia.
And I'll try~ Have a good day.
And I'll try~ Have a good day.
- Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:57 am
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: How can I get ROMS 3.0
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3674
How can I get ROMS 3.0
Hi everyone !
I've been trying to find out how to download ROMS 3.0 but I couldn't
have done yet. So, could you explain how/where to download ROMS 3.0 please?
And I don't know much about ROMS 3.0 so I'm wondering wheather I should pay for downloading ROMS 3.0 or not.
Thanks in advance
-Peter
I've been trying to find out how to download ROMS 3.0 but I couldn't
have done yet. So, could you explain how/where to download ROMS 3.0 please?
And I don't know much about ROMS 3.0 so I'm wondering wheather I should pay for downloading ROMS 3.0 or not.
Thanks in advance
-Peter
- Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:11 am
- Forum: ROMS Source
- Topic: About tracers...
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9264
About tracers...
Hi all I'd like to ask three questions. First, we can input river plume with salinity of zero in the model. I'm wondering if it is possible to dicribe the nutrient density of the river plume to see the influence of the river plume. Second, is there a way to calculate the diffusion of spilled oil ...
- Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:29 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Tidal Effect
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5210
Great!
What a detail answer! Thanks for a Gooooooood explanation.
I'll apply the shorter time step and let you know how it goes.
Thanks again! And have a GOOD day~
I'll apply the shorter time step and let you know how it goes.
Thanks again! And have a GOOD day~
- Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:40 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Tidal Effect
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5210
- Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:45 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Tidal Effect
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5210
Tidal Effect
Hi~ I'm using ROMS2.1 and I've got some problem when I put tidal effect. My case is North Pacific case(North-west Pacific region) and my cppdefs option is #define UV_ADV #define UV_COR #define UV_VIS2 #undef UV_VIS4 #define TS_DIF2 #undef TS_DIF4 #define MIX_GEO_TS #undef MIX_GEO_UV #define MIX_S_UV ...
- Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:56 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Some problems
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3405
Thx for the reply
I really appreciate your answer! Kate~
- Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:39 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Some problems
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3405
Some problems
Hi All~I'm using ROMS 2.1 and I'm goning to ask 3 questions. the 1st question is I'm trying to make new grid file, but the bathymetry is different with each rtarget value. Is there an appropriate rtarget value when I'm making the grid? the 2nd one is when I'm making a grid for a very zoomed area ...
- Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:27 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: About topography
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4803
- Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:02 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: About topography
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4803
Thank you for your answer
ETOPO5 is 5minite grid... Then what does 5 minute grid mean?
(It might be a basic question but I don't know... )
And is ETOPO2 a confirmed data? Does it reliable?
And the last but most important question, I'm using ROMS2.1, so can you tell me where the menual is?
Many thanks... Kate!
(It might be a basic question but I don't know... )
And is ETOPO2 a confirmed data? Does it reliable?
And the last but most important question, I'm using ROMS2.1, so can you tell me where the menual is?
Many thanks... Kate!
- Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:09 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: About topography
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4803
About topography
Hi Everyone! I'm a begginer with ROMS. And I wanna know about the topography which is used when we make grid. My friend said to me that use etopo5. He just said "You have to use etopo5 becasuse etopo5 has better depth data than etopo2" Are there any special difference between etopo2 and etopo5? I ...