Search found 78 matches
- Tue Aug 07, 2018 2:10 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: time record mismatch in the Hessian file for WC13/PSAS case
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2465
time record mismatch in the Hessian file for WC13/PSAS case
Hi there, I ran into some problem when trying to estimate the posterior errors in data assimilation WC13/PSAS case. I'm using the latest version of ROMS while adding two cpp options "POSTERIOR_EOFS" and "POSTERIOR_ERROR_I" to estimate posterior error. An error occurred after the DA run when trying ...
- Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:31 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Model normalization coefficients bug in WC13 case (v918)
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2285
Model normalization coefficients bug in WC13 case (v918)
Hello, I found the Normalization case of WC13 tutorial cannot compute the model coefficient even if you turn on the switch in c4dvar.in and set the NADJ to be different form the NTIMES. In short, older version of WC13 Normalization can give us model, initial, forcing and boundary normalization ...
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 4:29 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: weird iteration number in mod.nc file
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2970
weird iteration number in mod.nc file
Hi all, I'm using 4DVAR to run a test case. The total iteration number seems odd to me in the output mod.nc file. My understanding is that the total iteration equals Ninner * Nouter. However, the output iteration in mod.nc is larger that Ninner*Nouter. In my case, Ninner = 7 ; Minner = 8 ; Nouter ...
- Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:47 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Extreme large values at the end of OPT_Perturbation
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2830
Extreme large values at the end of OPT_Perturbation
Hi all, I ran the optimal perturbation case for both double_gyre and WC13 case, which give small values at the end (~10^-5). But when I ran the optimal perturbation for my own model, I got extreme large values (~10^5) at the end. I'm not sure why it happens. The time scale for the optimal ...
- Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:32 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: TLM_DRIVER & NL_BULK_FLUXES cause error
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2686
TLM_DRIVER & NL_BULK_FLUXES cause error
Hi all,
When I define TLM_DRIVER and NL_BULK_FLUX together (e.g. for the double_gyre test case), I got such error:
NETCDF_OPEN - unable to open existing NetCDF file: ^@^@^@^@^@^@^
call from: inquire.F
If I don't define NL_BULK_FLUX, it would be fine. Any idea? Thanks a lot.
When I define TLM_DRIVER and NL_BULK_FLUX together (e.g. for the double_gyre test case), I got such error:
NETCDF_OPEN - unable to open existing NetCDF file: ^@^@^@^@^@^@^
call from: inquire.F
If I don't define NL_BULK_FLUX, it would be fine. Any idea? Thanks a lot.
- Thu Jul 16, 2015 7:51 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Small bug in ad_v2dbc_im.F
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4658
Re: Small bug in ad_v2dbc_im.F
Hi Arango, Thanks a lot for the update. My post (Jul. 9) is before the update (Jul.10). That's the reason. Thanks. I don't know what are you talking about. I checked the code and it already have that correction! I think that you need to update . As you see below, ad_v2dbc_im.F already have the ...
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:10 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Possible IO bug in close_io.F
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3096
Possible IO bug in close_io.F
In close_io.F line 69 45 DO i=1,nFfiles(ng) 46 IF ((FRC(i,ng)%Nfiles.gt.1).and.(FRC(i,ng)%ncid.ge.0)) THEN 47 FRCids(i,ng)=-1 48 DO j=1,NV 49 IF (ncFRCid(j,ng).eq.FRC(i,ng)%ncid) THEN 50 ncFRCid(j,ng)=-1 51 END IF 52 END DO 53 IF (model.eq.iADM) THEN 54 DO j=1,FRC(i,ng)%Nfiles 55 IF ((FRC(i,ng)%time ...
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 2:33 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Bug in mod_boundary.F
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3262
Re: Bug in mod_boundary.F
Yes, you are right. I ran into the same problem too. It's in mod_boundary.F line1100. isouth should be inorth.
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 2:14 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Small bug in ad_v2dbc_im.F
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4658
Re: Small bug in ad_v2dbc_im.F
I found this problem too after extensive debugging. But the bug has not been fixed yet. Hope it can be fixed soon, so people like me won't speed too much time on debugging. Thanks a lot. I've found what appears to be a small bug in ad_v2dbc_im.F (svn revision 758). When using the ADM_DRIVER option ...
- Wed Jul 01, 2015 4:23 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Tangent Initial Norm is NaN
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6402
Tangent Initial Norm is NaN
Hi all, When I do the optimal perturbation run, I got the error info at the first step of model run. PROPAGATOR - Grid: 01, Tangent Initial Norm: NaN STEP Day HH:MM:SS KINETIC_ENRG POTEN_ENRG TOTAL_ENRG NET_VOLUME 0 55136 00:00:00 5.704437E-23 NaN NaN 6.042164E+16 I'm not sure what causes this ...
- Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:22 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Fatal error in MPI_Allreduce: Invalid datatype
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2430
Fatal error in MPI_Allreduce: Invalid datatype
Hi all, I got an error while run the double_gyre/OP case. The error message is DEF_GST - creating checkpointing file, Grid : ^A^@^@^@ DEF_GST - creating checkpointing file, Grid : gyre3d_gst.nc Fatal error in MPI_Allreduce: Invalid datatype, error stack: MPI_Allreduce(861): MPI_Allreduce(sbuf ...
- Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:19 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Is the Lanczos vector file necessary for adjoint to initials
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3286
Is the Lanczos vector file necessary for adjoint to initials
Hi all, In WC13 R4DVAR_sensitivity case, the Lanczos vector file is needed for the adjoint sensitivity analysis to the observation. However, if we only consider the adjoint sensitivity to the initial/forcing/obcs, is the Lanczos vector files still necessary? If the file is necessary, how can we get ...
- Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:22 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: A quick question about adjoint sensitivity analysis
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3179
A quick question about adjoint sensitivity analysis
Hi all,
I understand that for data assimilation, the objective is to minimize the error covariance related J function. For adjoint sensitivity analysis, are we minimizing the indicator function? During that process, all the observation-related inputs are not required, right? Thank you very much.
I understand that for data assimilation, the objective is to minimize the error covariance related J function. For adjoint sensitivity analysis, are we minimizing the indicator function? During that process, all the observation-related inputs are not required, right? Thank you very much.
- Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:16 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: too strong surface current
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1931
too strong surface current
Hi all,
There's a too strong surface coastal current for my simulation. Generally, my simulation is OK. What could cause a strong surface coast current? Wind? or anything else? Thank you for any suggestion.
leon
There's a too strong surface coastal current for my simulation. Generally, my simulation is OK. What could cause a strong surface coast current? Wind? or anything else? Thank you for any suggestion.
leon
- Wed May 29, 2013 9:05 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Omit ‘&’ in trunk/ROMS/Utility/wrt_tides.F
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2109
Omit ‘&’ in trunk/ROMS/Utility/wrt_tides.F
Hi,
It seems that a '&' is omitted in the end of trunk/ROMS/Utility/wrt_tides.F(line 277).
277 20 FORMAT (6x,'WRT_TIDES - wrote time-accumulated tide harmonics, ',
278 & 'Grid ',i2.2)
Best,
X
It seems that a '&' is omitted in the end of trunk/ROMS/Utility/wrt_tides.F(line 277).
277 20 FORMAT (6x,'WRT_TIDES - wrote time-accumulated tide harmonics, ',
278 & 'Grid ',i2.2)
Best,
X
- Wed May 01, 2013 6:19 pm
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: Help~Got too high T and too low S in the bottom layer
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6176
Re: Help~Got too high T and too low S in the bottom layer
Thank you for the advice. The weird thing is that when I just run the circulatio part without sediment submodel, everything is fine. And the false TS only occur at the bottom layer when running the sediment model. Anyway, thank you for your suggestion.
- Wed May 01, 2013 3:56 pm
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: Help~Got too high T and too low S in the bottom layer
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6176
Re: Help~Got too high T and too low S in the bottom layer
Hi John,
Thank you for the reply. I just tried to not use sed_dens, but I got the same problem. The TS are totally wrong. Do you have any suggestion? Thanks
Thank you for the reply. I just tried to not use sed_dens, but I got the same problem. The TS are totally wrong. Do you have any suggestion? Thanks
- Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:41 pm
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: Help~Got too high T and too low S in the bottom layer
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6176
Help~Got too high T and too low S in the bottom layer
Hi all, I'm using ROMS-SWAN-Sediment coupled model to simulate river sediment transport on continental shelf. However, at the river mouth, the T goes too high, about 300, and the salinity goes to low, about -300, after 7 months running. The river sediment concentration is really high, about 50 kg/m ...
- Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:47 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: How to get the directional spreading values in TPAR files?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1391
How to get the directional spreading values in TPAR files?
Dear all,
I'm using WWIII to interpolate the OBC for my ROMS-SWAN model. However, I can't
find any information about the fifth values in the TPAR files (the
directional spreading values). Does anybody have such experiences? Thank
you very much.
Best,
leon
I'm using WWIII to interpolate the OBC for my ROMS-SWAN model. However, I can't
find any information about the fifth values in the TPAR files (the
directional spreading values). Does anybody have such experiences? Thank
you very much.
Best,
leon
- Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:24 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: possble a little bug in varinfo.dat
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3340
possble a little bug in varinfo.dat
In file "varinfo.dat", 'river_dye_' ! Input 'river runoff dye concentration' 'kilogram meter-3' ! [kg/m3] 'river_dye, scalar, series' 'ocean_time' 'idRtrc(inert(i))' 'nulvar' 1.0d0 I think the "ocean_time" should be "river_time" . Am I right?
- Sat Jun 05, 2010 4:27 am
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: Is there any difference for different bed layer number?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5095
Is there any difference for different bed layer number?
Dear all, Recently, I'm doubtful about the number of sediemnt bed layers. You can set three bed layers or five bed layers or some else. Is there any difference? I read the paper Warner et al. wrote in 2008. What I got is that 3 bed layers maybe ok. So what's the effect of setting more bed layers ...
- Fri May 28, 2010 1:20 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Are there any conventions for nudging time scales setting?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4362
Re: Are there any conventions for nudging time scales setting?
Hi,Kate. Thank you very much for your reply.
How did you determine the nudging coefficients? By expericences?
And do you use the coefficents for all the simulation time scales? For exmaple, the real time scale and the climatological time scale.
Thanks~
How did you determine the nudging coefficients? By expericences?
And do you use the coefficents for all the simulation time scales? For exmaple, the real time scale and the climatological time scale.
Thanks~
- Thu May 27, 2010 3:27 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Are there any conventions for nudging time scales setting?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4362
Are there any conventions for nudging time scales setting?
Dear all, Sometimes, I'm not sure about the nudging time scales in the *.in file of ROMS. Actually, different settling about them will get different resluts. The current around the boundary may not flow out or fully radiated when the nudging time scales are set appropriately. For exmample, when a ...
- Sat May 15, 2010 6:26 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: Deviatory Stress Tensor
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9270
Re: Deviatory Stress Tensor
Hi, I'm confused about the formulas you give in your document.
What dose the 'Fu' painted in the attachfile represent in the formula?
Actually, I'm confused about the horizontal mxing treatment of ROMS. Could you please recommend some papers abouth that?
Thank you very much~
What dose the 'Fu' painted in the attachfile represent in the formula?
Actually, I'm confused about the horizontal mxing treatment of ROMS. Could you please recommend some papers abouth that?
Thank you very much~
- Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:17 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: problems when update from r442 to r444
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2094
problems when update from r442 to r444
Dear all, The model is running well before updated to r444. But when updated to r444, the model exits after the first step. I run the model in our cluster, the message is' signall 15 recieved'. I did not change anything, but just update to r444. The previous well-running model just exits without ...
- Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:44 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: How is the cohesive sediment treated in the latest ROMS?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2615
How is the cohesive sediment treated in the latest ROMS?
Dear all, How is the cohesive sediment treated in the latest ROMS? Is the cohesive sediment and non-cohensive sediment treated the same way? I have read Warner's several articles. The cohesive and non-cohensive sediment is treated the same. Actually, the cohesive and non-cohesive sediment is really ...
- Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:10 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sediment bug in the latest verison 429
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6806
Re: sediment bug in the latest verison 429
First, thank you very much~ I update the code and there are still some errors. In the previous verison, there is no Ltracer option for mud or sand in the sediment.in file. The model is running ok. After updating to the latest version, the model runs well when the Ltracer option is F in sediment.in ...
- Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:08 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sediment bug in the latest verison 429
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6806
Re: sediment bug in the latest verison 429
Sorry for that. Actually, the error is about the river sediment. The files are all the same, But it is right in the ROMS version 399 and wrong in the verison 429 or the lastest one. The north south east and west boundary sediment condition all exist in the bry file. Log files are below: Time is date ...
- Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:38 pm
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: How to set the value of surface erosion rate in sediment.in?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3989
How to set the value of surface erosion rate in sediment.in?
Dear all, I am using the sediment model now. However, I'm confused about the value of surface erosion rate in the sediment.in file. Actually, a lot of factors influence the surface erosion rate, such as sediment diameter, current speed and so on. Other values can be caculated using the Sediment ...
- Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:40 pm
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: Sediments produce even the bed layer thikness is zero
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2942
Sediments produce even the bed layer thikness is zero
Dear fellows, In the sediment model,there has to be at least one bed layer so that the sediment can settle onto the sea floor. One interesting thing is that it will still produce sediments even you have set the thickness of the only one bed layer to be 0, whether you set the bed porosity to be 0.5 ...
- Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:59 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sediment bug in the latest verison 429
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6806
Re: sediment bug in the latest verison 429
I'm afraid there are still some problems with the variables, maybe with the bry file varibles. Pls check out~
- Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:41 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sediment bug in the latest verison 429
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6806
sediment bug in the latest verison 429
The error is in checkvar.F, when set the sediment on. The mud_01 and snad_01 are considered as mud_ and sand_
error information:
NLM:checkvar unable to find model variable : mud_
error information:
NLM:checkvar unable to find model variable : mud_
- Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:16 am
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: Why can't the number of bed layers be set to be zero?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3585
Re: Why can't the number of bed layers be set to be zero?
There has to be at least one bed layer so that the sediment can settle onto the sea floor. So set Nbed = 1, and init the thickness =0. That is fine. I suggest you set porosity = 0.5, not 0. In the future the porosity will be computed by the model. If you start the model with zero concentration in ...
- Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:16 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: why is the kinetic energy so small?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1811
why is the kinetic energy so small?
Dear all,
I find the kinetic energy in the model log file is very small. For exmaple, there is only 0.02 in the model domain 24N-41N, 117E-131E. Of course I did not find the unit. SO what's the unit?
Thank you ~
I find the kinetic energy in the model log file is very small. For exmaple, there is only 0.02 in the model domain 24N-41N, 117E-131E. Of course I did not find the unit. SO what's the unit?
Thank you ~
- Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:15 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: help~really confused about the so called add tidal forcing~
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7319
Re: help~really confused about the so called add tidal forcing~
Thank you very much~ I made the tidal forcing file before, I'm just not sure the way I define the tidal options in *.h file. Because when I add tidal forcing, the current just go disorderly, I mean not so good as the no tidal case. Maybe there are some problem with the tidal harmonics, I'll check it ...
- Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:30 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: help~really confused about the so called add tidal forcing~
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7319
Re: help~really confused about the so called add tidal forcing~
Dear all, I'm still confused about the tidal forcing. Actually, my model domain is East China Sea. At first, I get the OBC data--zeta,u,v, from OCCAM ( a global ocean model). And there is no tidal forcing. The model rusult is fine. But when I add tidal force, the currents just become disorderly. I'm ...
- Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:08 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: help~really confused about the so called add tidal forcing~
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7319
Re: help~really confused about the so called add tidal forcing~
Thank you very much. You really do me a favor. In my case, I use add_fsobc and add_m2obc. One more question, If I add tide using SSH_TIDE UV_TIDE ADD_FSOBC ADD_M2OBC, the model will generate tidal information such as amplitude, right? But how to output the tidal information? I didn't find settings ...
- Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:26 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: help~really confused about the so called add tidal forcing~
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7319
help~really confused about the so called add tidal forcing~
Dear all, After learning ROMS for several months, I'm really confused about the so called 'add tidal forcing. Q1: I have run a model with OBCs, which the OBC data are getted from some global ocean model such as HYCOM. There's no tidal forcing here. The result is good. If I want to simulate sediment ...
- Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:22 pm
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: Why can't the number of bed layers be set to be zero?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3585
Why can't the number of bed layers be set to be zero?
Dear all. Why can't the number of bed layers be set to be zero? Actually, when the number of layers (Nbed) is set to be zero, there is an error says that the Nbed can not be zero. I want to know why. I want to see how the river sediments transport over continental shelves. If I set the Nbed to be ...
- Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:13 pm
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: how to add sediment to the river?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7265
Re: how to add sediment to the river?
Cool~ You are totally right. I have tried to define the river sediment as river transport, then I got such errors: NETCDF_GET_FVAR_1D - error while reading variable: river_sand_01 in input file: /dcfs2/users/leon/Documents/roms_examples/sediment/sediment-forc.nc call from: get_cycle.F GET_NGFLD ...
- Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:46 am
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: how to add sediment to the river?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7265
Re: how to add sediment to the river?
Fist, thank you very much. I still have a question. Is the river sediment defined as the river runoff river_transport or the river_salt? For example, if as the river_salt, it should be N layers, but not for the river_transport. Which one is right? Thank you~
- Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:31 pm
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: how to add sediment to the river?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7265
Re: how to add sediment to the river?
I understand, I should add 'river_sediment' to the cpp*.h. But I'm not sure that if I must give the wave condition after I define the bottom boundary layer closure.
Any body?
Any suggestion?
Thank you~
Any body?
Any suggestion?
Thank you~
- Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:06 am
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: how to add sediment to the river?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7265
how to add sediment to the river?
Dear all, I want to add sediment to a river mouth. But I am not sure about the cpp defines. Is it ok if I set 'UV_PSOURCE TS_PSOURCE Q_PSOURCE'? I find there are 'river_mud_. river_sand_' in the file varinfo.dat. So is it ok? Or what should I set in the cpp defines if I want to add sediment to the ...
- Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:23 am
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: Open boundary problem for sediment
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4125
Re: Open boundary problem for sediment
Hi, I get the same problem, I try to add variables to 'varinfo.dat', but have not successed. But I am a little confused about what I do, because what arango said in https://www.myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1450 . Any way, I have to try. Can anybody give me some useful suggestion about this ...
- Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:11 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: blowing up when plus tide
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2041
blowing up when plus tide
Dear all, I got a problem. When I didn't plus tide, my model can run for a long time. But when I plus tide, it just blows up after a few time steps. Why? I add my *.h file with 'UV_TIDES, SSH_TIDES, ADD_FSOBC, ADD_M2OBC'. Am I right? What's the most possible problem? Any suggestion is ok. Thank you ...
- Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:08 am
- Forum: ROMS Sediment
- Topic: ROMS-SWAN Coupled System Users
- Replies: 21
- Views: 29588
Re: ROMS-SWAN Coupled System Users
Hi, John, I will use the ROMS-SWAM Coupled System to do some research on the sediment transport.
- Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:49 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: odd problem with hc
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7942
odd problem with hc
Hello all, I got an odd problem with hc. Actually, the probelm is NETCDF_CHECK_VAR-inconsistent value of variable:hc 3.000000E+00 2.999994E+00 in/users/leon/nest-init.nc. But I check the init file and grid file, the value of hc are all equal 3. What's the problem? By the way, I just update my ROMS ...
- Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:05 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: what's wrong with the seagrid spacer?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 12725
Re: what's wrong with the seagrid spacer?
Yes,it's the land mask computing which cousts a long time. But the seagrid I use is from the RNT toolbox( http://eros.eas.gatech.edu/RNT/ ). Maybe there are some different. I usually load the coastline first, then setup the grids and computing land mask. Finally, adding bathyment and editing land ...
- Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:13 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: what's wrong with the seagrid spacer?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 12725
Re: what's wrong with the seagrid spacer?
Actually, when I use the seagrid in RNT toolbox to compute the land mask, it always costs such a long time. Why does it cost such a long time? I know it depends on the number of grids and the computing domain. Are there other reasons? Which process costs the longest time? Can we improve it ?
- Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:25 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: what's wrong with the seagrid spacer?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 12725
Re: what's wrong with the seagrid spacer?
Thank you very much, rich. I know what's the problem. The seagrid that I use is from the RNT toolbox. Maybe it's different or old, so the spacer is not working. I download the one you told me. And the spacer works well. The RNT users should remeber that the RNT seagrid is to some extent different ...
- Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:02 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: what's wrong with the seagrid spacer?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 12725
what's wrong with the seagrid spacer?
It is said that seagrid can change the space of the grid by change the position of the spacer. I did as the seagrid tutorial, but the spacing is not changing. What's wrong with the seagrid spcaer? Can someone tell me why it doesn't work for me? Thank you very much~
leon
leon
- Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:18 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: RNT toolbox
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10122
Re: RNT toolbox
You'd better use the RNT in the Linux OS. And if you use RNT in the 32bit systerm, you need to recompile the mex files as the complie.txt said in the RNT website. By the way, RNT is really a good tool for ROMS beginners. Good luck.
leon
leon
- Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:00 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: How to do nesting using ROMS?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8577
Re: How to do nesting using ROMS?
Thanks all of you very much. Actually, RNT toolbox is also a useful tools for ROMS. You can get it from http://www.o3d.org/RNT/ . And there are also some tutorials on http://www.o3d.org/ROMS-Tutorial/ . Thanks a lot for Mr. E. Di Lorenzo. He really does a good job~
- Sat May 30, 2009 12:49 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: How to do nesting using ROMS?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8577
How to do nesting using ROMS?
Dear all,
Can ROMS do nesting right now? And how?
Are there any tutorials or tools or examples for ROMS nesting?
Any information is OK. Thank you very much~
Can ROMS do nesting right now? And how?
Are there any tutorials or tools or examples for ROMS nesting?
Any information is OK. Thank you very much~
- Wed May 27, 2009 1:41 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: open boundary conditions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3675
Re: open boundary conditions
I learn a lot from :http://sauron.urban.eng.osaka-cu.ac.jp/%7Emori/research/ROMS/roms_obc.pdf. But I am still confused about the wikiROMS said in https://www.myroms.org/wiki/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions What are the ways that ROMS can receive tides on the boundaries? 1. You can specify ...
- Wed May 27, 2009 1:17 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: rnc_CreateForcFile.m
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4914
Re: rnc_CreateForcFile.m
hi, I think it's the problem of netcdf.
Maybe you should choose the appropriate mexnc netcdf snctool for your version of matlab.
You can check follow link for more details.
https://www.myroms.org/wiki/index.php/MEXNC
Good luck!
Maybe you should choose the appropriate mexnc netcdf snctool for your version of matlab.
You can check follow link for more details.
https://www.myroms.org/wiki/index.php/MEXNC
Good luck!
- Fri May 22, 2009 4:31 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: open boundary conditions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3675
open boundary conditions
Dear all, I'm really confused about the different OBCs. There are several options in the cppdef.h,for example: ** Eastern edge open boundary condtions OPTIONS: ** ** ** ** EAST_FSCHAPMAN use if free-surface Chapman condition ** ** EAST_FSGRADIENT use if free-surface gradient condition ** ** EAST ...
- Fri May 15, 2009 4:51 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: How to use the RNT toolbox
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1757
How to use the RNT toolbox
Dear all, I am a little confused about the RNT toolbox(http://www.o3d.org/RNT/). There are some readmes in the toolbox, But still not enough. Now I am confused about the matlib/misc directory. I don't know what the files in the /misc diretory are used for. There are no any explanations. If you konw ...
- Sat May 09, 2009 2:43 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: Lateral Boundary Conditions?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5924
Re: Lateral Boundary Conditions?
Hi~ There is some information about the bounday conditons.Hope this is useful. http://www.oceanwave.jp/tmp/roms_obc.tgz https://www.myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=930&p=3232&hilit=nobuhito#p3232 I have the similar problem. I am cofused with the different boundary condtions, especially the ...
- Fri May 08, 2009 2:01 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Can someone tell me some details about open boundary options
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2935
Re: Can someone tell me some details about open boundary options
First, thank you very much. I have the roms_obc.pdf already. It just said some codes of the obc. But I still don't know the details mean of the obc options. I mean the physical means. Anyone can tell me that? Thanks~
- Tue May 05, 2009 3:17 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Can someone tell me some details about open boundary options
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2935
Can someone tell me some details about open boundary options
Dear all, In the cppdef.h of ROMS, we can see some open boundary condtion options. For example: ** Eastern edge open boundary condtions OPTIONS: ** ** ** ** EAST_FSCHAPMAN use if free-surface Chapman condition ** ** EAST_FSGRADIENT use if free-surface gradient condition ** ** EAST_FSRADIATION use if ...
- Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:20 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: problem about MPI process terminated unexpectedly
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4825
Re: problem when run the DAMEE application
thx for reply first, Acturally,the output files are all less than 200M. But I still got the problem: MPI process terminated unexpectedly Exit code -5 signaled from node48 Killing remote processes...DONE real 9862.22 user 0.02 sys 0.01 + exit 0 I am not familiar with the MPI. Wish someone can tell me ...
- Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:24 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: how does roms caculate the value of zeta?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6296
Re: how does roms caculate the value of zeta?
I change the dt value, but it still bolws up. This is my first application, I hope someone can help me. Thank you in advance. Information: Physical Parameters, Grid: 01 ============================= 86400 ntimes Number of timesteps for 3-D equations. 36.000 dt Timestep size (s) for 3-D equations. 50 ...
- Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:56 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: timestep musings
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8165
Re: timestep musings
I want to known that whether the CFL condition for ROMS is dt<sqrt(((min(min(dx))^2)+(min(min(dy))^2)) / (9.8 * (min(min(h))^2))) or not.
leon
leon
- Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:03 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: how does roms caculate the value of zeta?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6296
Re: how does roms caculate the value of zeta?
Thanks all of you. I really appreciate it.And I want to known that whether the CFL condition for ROMS is dt<sqrt(((min(min(dx))^2)+(min(min(dy))^2)) / (9.8 * (min(min(h))^2))) or not.
leon
leon
- Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:48 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: how does roms caculate the value of zeta?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6296
how does roms caculate the value of zeta?
I just use ROMS for my own application, But it blows up when just runs several steps. When I check the history file and restart file, I find the value of zeta as fllows(only a part of zeta values): zeta = _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, 0, 0.256860918381414, 0.254291715215559, 0.248481492553035, 0 ...
- Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:34 pm
- Forum: User Applications
- Topic: why I got "Illegal model configuration" with my application
- Replies: 1
- Views: 12125
why I got "Illegal model configuration" with my application
Dear all, I'm new to ROMS. When I run my own application, I got model configuration error. I am not familiar with the ROMS model configration. Can someone tell me what's wrong with my model configuration? Thank you very much. My model configuration is as follows: Time is date cat ${PSB_NODEFILE ...
- Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:15 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: problem about MPI process terminated unexpectedly
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4825
problem about MPI process terminated unexpectedly
I run the DAMEE application download from http://www.myroms.org/index.php?page=Datasets. What I do is just as the readme file tells me. But the program just exit when run at step 16320. The log file got such error: MPI process terminated unexpectedly Exit code -5 signaled from node46 Killing remote ...
- Thu Mar 12, 2009 2:42 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Problem about bathy extract.m of romsmatlab tools
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1641
Problem about bathy extract.m of romsmatlab tools
I did as arango said here(https://www.myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=45&p=70&hilit=bath&sid=4942beaa5724be5be7366aed7f299d07#p70).Then I use the seagrid to caculate the depth and mask of the gird area. But I think the result of depth is actually wrong. My area is 24N-41N 117E-131E. The related ...
- Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:05 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Problem about RNT MAIN_grid.m
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2717
Re: Problem about RNT MAIN_grid.m
yes,you are right.
I think
region =[min(grd.latr(:))-1,max(grd.latr(:))+1,min(grd.lonr(:))-1,max(grd.lonr(:))+1]
is ok.
Thank you very much
I think
region =[min(grd.latr(:))-1,max(grd.latr(:))+1,min(grd.lonr(:))-1,max(grd.lonr(:))+1]
is ok.
Thank you very much
- Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:01 pm
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Problem about RNT MAIN_grid.m
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2717
Problem about RNT MAIN_grid.m
Dear all, When I use the RNT toolbox(http://www.o3d.org/rnt/) to get my topography as the MAIN_grid.m said, I got problem when I run code of MAIN_grid below: %========================================================== % topography %========================================================== %EDIT ...
- Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:29 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Seagrid error
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13288
Re: Seagrid error
There are two mat2str functions, one is in the mexcdf5 directory of ROMS matlab tool, and the other one is in matlab/toolbox/matlab/strfun/ directory. The two mat2str functions are different. The first one is : function s = mat2str(x) % MAT2STR String equivalent to a matrix. % MAT2STR(X) converts ...
- Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:24 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: problem when run the ESTUARY_TEST case
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4824
Re: problem when run the ESTUARY_TEST case
Lm == 200 ! Number of I-direction INTERIOR RHO-points
Mm == 3 ! Number of J-direction INTERIOR RHO-points
N == 20 ! Number of vertical levels
I think the value of Mm is wrong in the ocean_estuary.in
Mm == 3 ! Number of J-direction INTERIOR RHO-points
N == 20 ! Number of vertical levels
I think the value of Mm is wrong in the ocean_estuary.in
- Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:00 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: problem when run the ESTUARY_TEST case
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4824
Re: problem when run the ESTUARY_TEST case
That's the piont! It's ok now. You are really cool! Great! Thank you very much!
- Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:39 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Is there any discussion group of ROMS like QQ or MSN group?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1761
Is there any discussion group of ROMS like QQ or MSN group?
Dear users,
I am new for ROMS, and when I learn ROMS, I get a lot of problems. I want to know if there are some groups like QQ or MSN for the users to discuss problems when they use the ROMS.
I really want to jiont if possible.
Or any one can create it?
Thanks!
I am new for ROMS, and when I learn ROMS, I get a lot of problems. I want to know if there are some groups like QQ or MSN for the users to discuss problems when they use the ROMS.
I really want to jiont if possible.
Or any one can create it?
Thanks!
- Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:43 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: problem when run the ESTUARY_TEST case
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4824
problem when run the ESTUARY_TEST case
Dear all, I am a new user of ROMS. I run the upwelling test, it's ok. But when I run the ESTUARY_TEST , after 'make',I get such problem: cd Build; /usr/bin/gfortran -c -frepack-arrays -O3 -ffast-math -ffree-form -ffree-line-length-none analytical.f90 analytical.f90:256.32: BOUNDARY(ng)%zeta_west(j ...
- Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:29 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: problem about the plotting package installation
- Replies: 27
- Views: 41084
Re: problem about the plotting package installation
thx,kate.I download the package again, then there is no problem. I think it must be something wrong in my previous packge. Anyway, thank you very much.
- Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:30 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: problem about the plotting package installation
- Replies: 27
- Views: 41084
problem about the plotting package installation
Dear users, I saw from wikiroms that we can use the plotting package for visualizing ROMS model output. But when I install the package as the wikiroms, I get such problems: leon@leon-desktop:/media/disk/linux/romstools/plot/src$ make /usr/bin/cpp -P -traditional -DLINUX -I/opt/g95soft/s_netcdf4 ...