Problems with npzd_Powell

Discussion about coupled ecosystem models

Moderators: arango, robertson

Post Reply
Message
Author
gabrielanalini
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Universidade Federal Fluminense

Problems with npzd_Powell

#1 Unread post by gabrielanalini »

Hi!

I am studying the response of phytoplankton community to eddy activity in Brazilian Southeast coast.

My hydrodinamic model is working fine, the problem happens with the npzd_Powell model. I made tests with both homogeneus initial conditions and idealized npzd fields. There seems to be no response or interaction between the npzd compartments.The vertical structure for physical variables works, but for the biological parameters not.

I made a run using the upwelling testcase with npzd_Powell active and everything seems to be fine, with instant response from the compartments.

Is there something else to set in the CP or .in for the coupling works?

I'm sending the .h and .in images and some plots.

I’d appreciate any help with this.

Thanks in advance!
Attachments
eddy.log
(3.78 MiB) Downloaded 600 times
eddy.in
(117.65 KiB) Downloaded 637 times
eddy.h
(1.88 KiB) Downloaded 669 times
dayno3_001.png
dayno3_001.png (9.43 KiB) Viewed 16451 times
dayno3_003.png
dayno3_003.png (9.43 KiB) Viewed 16451 times
no3_step8.png
no3_step8.png (55.06 KiB) Viewed 16451 times
dayVz_002.png

User avatar
kate
Posts: 4091
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: CFOS/UAF, USA

Re: Problems with npzd_Powell

#2 Unread post by kate »

First, you should find out why the colorbar for the first two vertical slice plots wants to extend to 1.e37. Are those points in the land mask?

User avatar
wilkin
Posts: 922
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 5:44 pm
Location: Rutgers University
Contact:

Re: Problems with npzd_Powell

#3 Unread post by wilkin »

Your log file shows the following:
Metrics information for Grid 01:
===============================

Minimum X-grid spacing, DXmin = 0.00000000E+00 km
Maximum X-grid spacing, DXmax = 2.97235216E+00 km
Minimum Y-grid spacing, DYmin = 0.00000000E+00 km
Maximum Y-grid spacing, DYmax = 2.97199962E+00 km
Minimum Z-grid spacing, DZmin = 0.00000000E+00 m
Maximum Z-grid spacing, DZmax = 3.91620893E+02 m
That's odd that you have zero as the minimum grid spacings in all dimensions.

Have you applied special/missing values in the land mask points of the grid metrics? I don't think ROMS will like that.
John Wilkin: DMCS Rutgers University
71 Dudley Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8521, USA. ph: 609-630-0559 jwilkin@rutgers.edu

gabrielanalini
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Universidade Federal Fluminense

Re: Problems with npzd_Powell

#4 Unread post by gabrielanalini »

Thank you very much for the replies Kate and Wilkin.

Kate, there is no land mask on the biological initial fields, I'm working on this.


Wilkin, I don't know why this is happening. I used to run my experiments in another machine, using MPI, and the minimum grid-spacing was fine. Now, im using OpenMP in a new machine, but I know people who use OpenMP as well without problems. This could be a problem?

chaoyu1985
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu May 04, 2017 1:31 pm
Location: south china sea institute of oceanography

Re: Problems with npzd_Powell

#5 Unread post by chaoyu1985 »

gabrielanalini wrote:Thank you very much for the replies Kate and Wilkin.

Kate, there is no land mask on the biological initial fields, I'm working on this.


Wilkin, I don't know why this is happening. I used to run my experiments in another machine, using MPI, and the minimum grid-spacing was fine. Now, im using OpenMP in a new machine, but I know people who use OpenMP as well without problems. This could be a problem?
Hi, i am runing npzd as well. How did u give the boundary condition (i.e.alkalinity,NH4,SDeN). In my study area,NH4 data is absent. I can not find any other reanalysis data from internet. So,I used a constent value for all grids and boundary condition. the model can not run sucessuflly. How did you set the boundary condition in the time series. did they vary with time ? did they match with the changes of the chlorophyll and phytoplankton? thank you so much for your help.

Post Reply