I have run into a problem updating my ROMS source.
A couple of weeks ago (16 April) I checked out the ROMS source from the trunk. This proceeded in a straightforward manner, once I had svn configured correctly for our proxy server. This gave me revision 27.
Today I went to my source directory and ran "svn update". This proceeded to update my files to revision 38. However it stopped before completion with
svn: Checksum mismatch for 'ROMS/Utility/inp_par.F'; expected: '7c9cc079a78ce9f23ed700de25108391', actual: '1483421ef1914fbfe3f0dac3f31f9a9e'
I tried removing ROMS/Utility/inp_par.F and retrieving a fresh copy. Svn recreates the file in question (to revision 27) but then stops with the same error.
I can update any files or directories that appear after ROMS/Utility/inp_par.F in the svn listing by specifying their names explicitly. It's a little tedious, but I think I have got everything now.
A quick search with Google suggests this is a problem with the repository:
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2004-06/0848.shtml
Or maybe a client bug:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python ... 57790.html
Has anyone else encountered this problem or something similar?
Subversion update problem
- m.hadfield
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 4:12 am
- Location: NIWA
- arango
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 4:41 pm
- Location: DMCS, Rutgers University
- Contact:
That happened to me too when trying to update. I got the same problem with inp_par.F. This seems to be a bug on svn. I also removed the Utility directory and checkout again and then I was able to update.
The other possible problem is that inp_par.F is the biggest source file in the repository. It seems that the r38 is fine and problem of the checksum was on earlier revision.
By the way, using google to find about errors is the way to go. I highly recommend all users to do this. We do it all the time and always find answers to our problems.
The other possible problem is that inp_par.F is the biggest source file in the repository. It seems that the r38 is fine and problem of the checksum was on earlier revision.
By the way, using google to find about errors is the way to go. I highly recommend all users to do this. We do it all the time and always find answers to our problems.