forcing make a few points of result strange

[zhouchaojie]

when I add the forcing files in the simulation，there are few points whose temperature decrease very quick, even under 0, but it seems normal without the forcing files, besides, all the points are locate at the boundary, with only the mask_rho=1, other mask are 0

[kate]

You need to do more detective work here. Did you define BULK_FLUXES? Have you looked at your forcing files? If you used BULK_FLUXES, have you looked at the resulting heat fluxes? You say it's only bad at the boundary. Could you show plots?

[zhouchaojie]

You need to do more detective work here. Did you define BULK_FLUXES? Have you looked at your forcing files? If you used BULK_FLUXES, have you looked at the resulting heat fluxes? You say it's only bad at the boundary. Could you show plots?

Yeah,I have defined BULK_FLUXES, all my forcing files are sparse, so if the forcing has some bad points, the influence on the model result may be a block？ What's worse, I have no idea how to check the resulting heat fluxes, could you show me? The attachment file is the sst result after 80d's simulation，at the bottom, it is the location of these strange points and the result of each 10d. i am very appreciated for your help, Kate.

[kate]

Are you looking at history or averages output? There is for example:

Code: Select all

Hout(idTsur) == T T     ! shflux, ssflux     surface net heat and salt flux

Followed by the four main components of heat flux:

Code: Select all

Hout(idLhea) == T       ! latent             latent heat flux 
Hout(idShea) == T       ! sensible           sensible heat flux 
Hout(idLrad) == T       ! lwrad              longwave radiation flux 
Hout(idSrad) == T       ! swrad              shortwave radiation flux 

You could also try putting a station at the bad point, turning on STATIONS and looking at stations output, same fields.