Search found 10 matches
- Wed May 15, 2024 9:44 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: error in define WIND_MINUS_CURRENT
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3475
error in define WIND_MINUS_CURRENT
Hello everyone I want to adjust the wind stress by define WIND_MINUS_CURRENT The following error was encountered at compile time: bulk_flux.f90(322): error #6780: A dummy argument with the INTENT(IN) attribute shall not be defined nor become undefined. [UWIND] Uwind(i,j)=Uwind(i,j)-0.5_r8* ...
- Tue May 14, 2024 9:09 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: too large surface velocity
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3680
too large surface velocity
Hello everyone, I am running a test, and the surface velocity in the ROMS result file is obviously too large compared with hycom. roms result: roms_u_current.png hycom data: hycom_water_u.png Then I output uwind and vwind in his file, and compared with the input wind field of 10m, the output uwind ...
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:04 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: After opening the diagnostic_UV, nc file(avg) outputs presents different physical results
- Replies: 0
- Views: 7129
After opening the diagnostic_UV, nc file(avg) outputs presents different physical results
I'm having a problem with my input file and parameters not changing, the only thing that's changed is that I've turned on the diagnostic.
Results for: Unopened dia Results for: opened dia This is the setting in my .h file
Results for: Unopened dia Results for: opened dia This is the setting in my .h file
- Thu Feb 08, 2024 5:05 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: blowing-up with ' REASON: KEchar = NaN, PEchar = NaN' report
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4449
blowing-up with ' REASON: KEchar = NaN, PEchar = NaN' report
Hi, good day for everyone. I was running a climate state case recently, and after five months of running the model,the model blow up with the 'REASON: KEchar = NaN, PEchar = NaN' report。This is a nested grid model, I've been searching the forums for answers to this question, and some people say it h ...
- Fri Jul 28, 2023 10:14 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Some Questions about make a forecasting system
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8208
Re: Some Questions about make a forecasting system
What are you trying to forecast? If you are only forecasting total water levels or flooding, the problem is somewhat simpler and less sensitive to the use of data assimilation. Instead it requires more attention to met forcing, ensembling, river inputs, and perhaps postprocessing bias corrections ...
- Thu Jul 27, 2023 3:12 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Some Questions about make a forecasting system
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8208
Some Questions about make a forecasting system
I need to make a forecasting system now, and I have some questions about it. Hope all the teachers can give me some help. :oops: :oops: :oops: I read some literature and learned that the forecast system usually provides an available initial field for the real simulation of the model through spinup ...
- Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:54 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Too small M2 tide amplitude result in estuary
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5277
Too small M2 tide amplitude result in estuary
Hi. I encountered too small and abnormal M2 tide amplitude result compared to observation data. The tidal forcing is from the TPXO 7.2. This reslut in the weak surface mixing.(or maybe tide is not the only factor affect mixing,but my m2 tide amplitude model result is too sall) I've tried different 2D ...
- Mon Aug 08, 2022 8:11 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: the middle layer velocity blows up
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4399
the middle layer velocity blows up
I update the ROMS from Version 3.4 to 4.1, then the middle layer velocity blows up in the 9000th step, while it runs well in ROMS version 3.4 with same input nc and initial conditions. Fig.1 is the blow up point, it is on the shore of an island. I try to make the depth get more smooth, or change it ...
- Wed Jun 22, 2022 10:19 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: too high bottom temperature result in estuary
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16522
Re: too high bottom temperature result in estuary
Tmax is time. The max value 26.6 is OK. Consider your jerlov water type WTYPE. If it's 1 (clear ocean water) then in a shallow estuary a lot of sunlight reaches the seafloor and is trapped there because the bottom is effectively insulated. Use type 3 or 4 and absorption is more rapid keeping ...
- Sun Jun 12, 2022 2:17 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: too high bottom temperature result in estuary
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16522
too high bottom temperature result in estuary
Hi. I encountered high and abnormal bottom temperature results compared to observation data. The surface temperature of the whole model domain is same like MODIS and HYCOM. But in my study domain, the estuary, its temperature is too high, especially at the bottom, this result is abnormal. I've tried ...