Search found 10 matches

by cheng_dada
Wed May 15, 2024 9:44 am
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: error in define WIND_MINUS_CURRENT
Replies: 1
Views: 3475

error in define WIND_MINUS_CURRENT

Hello everyone I want to adjust the wind stress by define WIND_MINUS_CURRENT The following error was encountered at compile time: bulk_flux.f90(322): error #6780: A dummy argument with the INTENT(IN) attribute shall not be defined nor become undefined. [UWIND] Uwind(i,j)=Uwind(i,j)-0.5_r8* ...
by cheng_dada
Tue May 14, 2024 9:09 am
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: too large surface velocity
Replies: 1
Views: 3680

too large surface velocity

Hello everyone, I am running a test, and the surface velocity in the ROMS result file is obviously too large compared with hycom. roms result: roms_u_current.png hycom data: hycom_water_u.png Then I output uwind and vwind in his file, and compared with the input wind field of 10m, the output uwind ...
by cheng_dada
Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:04 am
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: After opening the diagnostic_UV, nc file(avg) outputs presents different physical results
Replies: 0
Views: 7129

After opening the diagnostic_UV, nc file(avg) outputs presents different physical results

I'm having a problem with my input file and parameters not changing, the only thing that's changed is that I've turned on the diagnostic.
Results for: Unopened dia
未开dia.png
未开dia.png (128.6 KiB) Viewed 7124 times
Results for: opened dia
开dia.png
开dia.png (142.86 KiB) Viewed 7124 times
This is the setting in my .h file
h.png
h.png (7.28 KiB) Viewed 7124 times
by cheng_dada
Thu Feb 08, 2024 5:05 pm
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: blowing-up with ' REASON: KEchar = NaN, PEchar = NaN' report
Replies: 1
Views: 4449

blowing-up with ' REASON: KEchar = NaN, PEchar = NaN' report

Hi, good day for everyone. I was running a climate state case recently, and after five months of running the model,the model blow up with the 'REASON: KEchar = NaN, PEchar = NaN' report。This is a nested grid model, I've been searching the forums for answers to this question, and some people say it h ...
by cheng_dada
Fri Jul 28, 2023 10:14 am
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: Some Questions about make a forecasting system
Replies: 3
Views: 8208

Re: Some Questions about make a forecasting system

What are you trying to forecast? If you are only forecasting total water levels or flooding, the problem is somewhat simpler and less sensitive to the use of data assimilation. Instead it requires more attention to met forcing, ensembling, river inputs, and perhaps postprocessing bias corrections ...
by cheng_dada
Thu Jul 27, 2023 3:12 am
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: Some Questions about make a forecasting system
Replies: 3
Views: 8208

Some Questions about make a forecasting system

I need to make a forecasting system now, and I have some questions about it. Hope all the teachers can give me some help. :oops: :oops: :oops: I read some literature and learned that the forecast system usually provides an available initial field for the real simulation of the model through spinup ...
by cheng_dada
Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:54 am
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: Too small M2 tide amplitude result in estuary
Replies: 0
Views: 5277

Too small M2 tide amplitude result in estuary

Hi. I encountered too small and abnormal M2 tide amplitude result compared to observation data. The tidal forcing is from the TPXO 7.2. This reslut in the weak surface mixing.(or maybe tide is not the only factor affect mixing,but my m2 tide amplitude model result is too sall) I've tried different 2D ...
by cheng_dada
Mon Aug 08, 2022 8:11 am
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: the middle layer velocity blows up
Replies: 1
Views: 4399

the middle layer velocity blows up

I update the ROMS from Version 3.4 to 4.1, then the middle layer velocity blows up in the 9000th step, while it runs well in ROMS version 3.4 with same input nc and initial conditions. Fig.1 is the blow up point, it is on the shore of an island. I try to make the depth get more smooth, or change it ...
by cheng_dada
Wed Jun 22, 2022 10:19 am
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: too high bottom temperature result in estuary
Replies: 6
Views: 16522

Re: too high bottom temperature result in estuary

Tmax is time. The max value 26.6 is OK. Consider your jerlov water type WTYPE. If it's 1 (clear ocean water) then in a shallow estuary a lot of sunlight reaches the seafloor and is trapped there because the bottom is effectively insulated. Use type 3 or 4 and absorption is more rapid keeping ...
by cheng_dada
Sun Jun 12, 2022 2:17 pm
Forum: ROMS Discussion
Topic: too high bottom temperature result in estuary
Replies: 6
Views: 16522

too high bottom temperature result in estuary

Hi. I encountered high and abnormal bottom temperature results compared to observation data. The surface temperature of the whole model domain is same like MODIS and HYCOM. But in my study domain, the estuary, its temperature is too high, especially at the bottom, this result is abnormal. I've tried ...