I have this question . The Kpp scheme in ROMS is 1994 or 2005?
Anyone has the kpp2005?
Search found 9 matches
- Sat Mar 18, 2023 2:58 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: the kpp scheme in ROMS is 1994 or 2005 ?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5473
- Fri Sep 23, 2022 8:40 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: A Bug for the multifile when using the PIO
- Replies: 1
- Views: 17189
A Bug for the multifile when using the PIO
I found a bug ,which is the multifile when using the PIO(trunk_4.0),but I can not fix it.
This is my FRC file
FRCNAME == !./input/scsa_frc.nc
../YGA/ERA5/scs/era5_srf_2017.nc \
../YGA/ERA5/scs/era5_pair_2017.nc \
../YGA/ERA5/scs/era5_tair_2017_1.nc |
../YGA/ERA5/scs/era5_tair_2017_2.nc ...
This is my FRC file
FRCNAME == !./input/scsa_frc.nc
../YGA/ERA5/scs/era5_srf_2017.nc \
../YGA/ERA5/scs/era5_pair_2017.nc \
../YGA/ERA5/scs/era5_tair_2017_1.nc |
../YGA/ERA5/scs/era5_tair_2017_2.nc ...
- Wed Jul 13, 2022 2:14 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: A bug in the get_grid.F
- Replies: 0
- Views: 14249
A bug in the get_grid.F
When I Use the UV_DRAG_GRID and PIO_LIB, I got this error.
In get_grid.F have defined the pioVar_dragL, pioVar_dragQ
# if defined UV_DRAG_GRID && !defined ANA_DRAG
TYPE (My_VarDesc) :: pioVar_dragL, pioVar_dragQ, pioVar_ZoBL
# endif
but in line 4856 and line 4919 the var name become pioVar_rdrag ...
In get_grid.F have defined the pioVar_dragL, pioVar_dragQ
# if defined UV_DRAG_GRID && !defined ANA_DRAG
TYPE (My_VarDesc) :: pioVar_dragL, pioVar_dragQ, pioVar_ZoBL
# endif
but in line 4856 and line 4919 the var name become pioVar_rdrag ...
- Tue Jul 05, 2022 9:24 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: A bug in the equilibrium_tide.F
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15480
A bug in the equilibrium_tide.F
A bug in the equilibrium_tide.F 204 line:
Code: Select all
& S2%Afl*Cos2Lat(i,j)* &
& COS(S2%omega*t_time_sec+ &
& deg2rad*([b]2.0+r8[/b]*lonr(i,j)+S2%chi+S2%nu))+ &
- Wed May 28, 2014 11:45 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Nested grids and bathymetry smoothing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8975
Re: Nested grids and bathymetry smoothing
I also have the same problems in my realistic examples. It seems that the 2-way refined grids is very easy to blowing-up at the boundary areas between the fine grid and coarse grid. Thanks for help !
- Tue May 06, 2014 1:53 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: 3-level nesting
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3517
Re: 3-level nesting
I have the same problems ,the contact.m can generate the NGC file for 2-levels and 3-grids ,but it can not generate the files for 3-level nest.
- Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:39 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: ini_hmixcoef.F
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2925
ini_hmixcoef.F
Line 318-319
DO j=JstrP,JendT
DO i=IstrP,IendT
visc2_p(i,j)=cff*(grdscl(i-1,j-1)+grdscl(i,j-1))+ &
& grdscl(i-1,j )+grdscl(i,j )+ &
END DO
END DO
DO j=JstrP,JendT
DO i=IstrP,IendT
visc2_p(i,j)=cff*(grdscl(i-1,j-1)+grdscl(i,j-1))+ &
& grdscl(i-1,j )+grdscl(i,j )+ &
END DO
END DO
- Sun Dec 15, 2013 1:26 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: some questions about the WET_DRY
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7598
Re: some questions about the WET_DRY
Thanks for your reply, Kate.And do you mean that I must using Vstretching=4 Vtransform=2,if I want to active the WET_DRY?kate wrote:In the Rutgers code, we are now using Vstretching=4 and Vtransform=2, which will allow for any hc you like, independent of hmin.
- Fri Dec 13, 2013 2:53 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: some questions about the WET_DRY
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7598
some questions about the WET_DRY
Dear all,
If I use the WET_DRY simulation ,how to set the hc,hmin and the Tcline? My Vtransform == 1 and Vstretching == 1,so if the h is negative, the hc will be 0 and the model will blow up at the begin.
Thanks in advance
If I use the WET_DRY simulation ,how to set the hc,hmin and the Tcline? My Vtransform == 1 and Vstretching == 1,so if the h is negative, the hc will be 0 and the model will blow up at the begin.
Thanks in advance