Search found 10 matches
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:15 pm
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: locally increasing grid resolution using seagrid
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5842
Re: locally increasing grid resolution using seagrid
You can certainly increase the resolution with seagrid, but since it is a structured grid you´ll have a strip of high resolution all along your grid from east to west and from north to south. Then you´ll have an area (for example in your eastern border) with high resolution and deep bathymetry ...
- Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:20 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Why I got such a different tide solution using TPXO data
- Replies: 13
- Views: 11256
Re: Why I got such a different tide solution using TPXO data
Hi stone,
I see you´re using ANA_FSOBC and Chapman boundary conditions. Maybe there´s a conflict there. Have you checked this?
Regards,
Mauricio.
Prooceano - Brasil.
I see you´re using ANA_FSOBC and Chapman boundary conditions. Maybe there´s a conflict there. Have you checked this?
Regards,
Mauricio.
Prooceano - Brasil.
- Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:44 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Problem using ana_m2obc
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3044
Re: Problem using ana_m2obc
Hi Kate. Thanks for the reply.
I´m running serial, so I guess it´s complaining about ana_m2obc.h.
I used ana_m2obc I downloaded along with ROMS code and just modified after the "else" part:
#else
...
# ifdef WEST_M2OBC
IF (WESTERN_EDGE) THEN
DO j=JstrR,JendR
BOUNDARY(ng)%ubar_west(j)=-0.65 ...
I´m running serial, so I guess it´s complaining about ana_m2obc.h.
I used ana_m2obc I downloaded along with ROMS code and just modified after the "else" part:
#else
...
# ifdef WEST_M2OBC
IF (WESTERN_EDGE) THEN
DO j=JstrR,JendR
BOUNDARY(ng)%ubar_west(j)=-0.65 ...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:15 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Problem using ana_m2obc
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3044
Problem using ana_m2obc
Dear Rommers,
I´m trying to model a large and flat river in the Amazon basin. I have information of flow and velocity in the western boundary, wich I fit to an analytical expression and I´m trying to use ana_m2obc to force the model. When compiling the model I receive this error messages ...
I´m trying to model a large and flat river in the Amazon basin. I have information of flow and velocity in the western boundary, wich I fit to an analytical expression and I´m trying to use ana_m2obc to force the model. When compiling the model I receive this error messages ...
- Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:51 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Confused about test cases
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6661
Re: Confused about test cases
Hi bibi951,
I didn´t go through the equations yet to check why it blew up at the boundary (and to be honest I´m not quite sure if I´ll do it...). What I can tell is that the problem is on the barotropic velocity at the boundary. The combination of reduced physics with M2FLATHER makes it unstable ...
I didn´t go through the equations yet to check why it blew up at the boundary (and to be honest I´m not quite sure if I´ll do it...). What I can tell is that the problem is on the barotropic velocity at the boundary. The combination of reduced physics with M2FLATHER makes it unstable ...
- Thu May 28, 2009 2:58 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Confused about test cases
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6661
Re: Confused about test cases
Hi bibi951 and all,
Just for the record, about my previous post. I found the problem I was facing about small tidal amplitude (and of course, was my mistake! :oops: ). So in order to help others that might face the same mistake...
The problem wasn´t on the tidal velocity ellipses estimation for ...
Just for the record, about my previous post. I found the problem I was facing about small tidal amplitude (and of course, was my mistake! :oops: ). So in order to help others that might face the same mistake...
The problem wasn´t on the tidal velocity ellipses estimation for ...
- Thu May 14, 2009 2:36 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Confused about test cases
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6661
Re: Confused about test cases
Hi bibi951,
I was facing the same problem, i.e. small tide amplitudes compared to observed and even to the forcing imposed. Then I checked the following discussion https://www.myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=854 and used the FSOBC_REDUCED cpp option. The tidal amplitudes are now much closer ...
I was facing the same problem, i.e. small tide amplitudes compared to observed and even to the forcing imposed. Then I checked the following discussion https://www.myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=854 and used the FSOBC_REDUCED cpp option. The tidal amplitudes are now much closer ...
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 3:23 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Strange wind stress behavior
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3018
Re: Strange wind stress behavior
Yes. There are some backward steps on the sms_time variable. I´ll correct that.
Thank you!
Mauricio Fragoso
PROOCEANO - Brasil
Thank you!
Mauricio Fragoso
PROOCEANO - Brasil
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:06 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Strange wind stress behavior
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3018
Re: Strange wind stress behavior
I think you got the point. The output (see below) shows that last stress reading was on day 273 - 06:00. At 12:00 it should have read the next field, but it didn´t until the end of the run. The ECCO fields are being normally read though. Do you know why this is happening?
Thank you.
Mauricio ...
Thank you.
Mauricio ...
- Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:53 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Strange wind stress behavior
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3018
Strange wind stress behavior
Dear all,
I´m running ROMS 3.0 for southwestern Atlantic Ocean using ECCO data (every 10 days) for initial and boundary conditions and NCEP winds (every 6 hours) for atmospheric forcing for a 2007 hindcast. I had to interrupt the run two times and performed a restart at day 140 and day 200.
I ...
I´m running ROMS 3.0 for southwestern Atlantic Ocean using ECCO data (every 10 days) for initial and boundary conditions and NCEP winds (every 6 hours) for atmospheric forcing for a 2007 hindcast. I had to interrupt the run two times and performed a restart at day 140 and day 200.
I ...