Search found 3 matches
- Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Adjoint model blow up
- Replies: 13
- Views: 36800
Re: Adjoint model blow up
Greetings once more
Try to run using the same options
for boundary conditions, i.e. set
NLM obc to be the same with adjoint.
Another suggestion is to unset the
relaxation options (QCORRECTION,
SRELAXATION) and run the nonlinear
model with BULK_FLUXES enable.
Also which of the available
4DVAR ...
- Wed Jul 15, 2020 4:39 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Adjoint model blow up
- Replies: 13
- Views: 36800
Re: Adjoint model blow up
Hi, Giannis
thank you for your reply.
Greetings
You are using nested boundary conditions in NLM model
but it seems you didn't enable the NESTING cpp option.
Also why you are using mixed radiation conditions in
NLM model? In general the choice of the boundary conditions
in the NLM model I ...
thank you for your reply.
Greetings
You are using nested boundary conditions in NLM model
but it seems you didn't enable the NESTING cpp option.
Also why you are using mixed radiation conditions in
NLM model? In general the choice of the boundary conditions
in the NLM model I ...
- Mon Jul 13, 2020 12:10 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Adjoint model blow up
- Replies: 13
- Views: 36800
Re: Adjoint model blow up
Dear all,
I am condcting a backward tracking using the Adjoint model. I have run the FWD model successfully. However, the similar blow up at the first step of the adjoint model.
1. as suggested by arango, I have run the 4D-Var tutorial documented in WikiROMS succefully;
2. as sueggested by ...
I am condcting a backward tracking using the Adjoint model. I have run the FWD model successfully. However, the similar blow up at the first step of the adjoint model.
1. as suggested by arango, I have run the 4D-Var tutorial documented in WikiROMS succefully;
2. as sueggested by ...