Hi Guangyu,
You might find this paper useful: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2019.12.002
There are two different approaches to force the tides: 1) through the boundaries by downscaling from a tide-resolving model (for which you turn on add_fsobc and add_m2obc) and 2)from a tide model by ...
Search found 15 matches
- Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:21 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Appropriate open boundary conditions for tidal forcing
- Replies: 11
- Views: 11436
- Mon May 15, 2017 2:49 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Tidal Forcing File
- Replies: 16
- Views: 19402
Re: Tidal Forcing File
Giannis,
Another thing you might want to look at are your barotropic boundary conditions. If you are using ADD_FSOBC & ADD_U2OBC as well as SSH_TIDES/UV_TIDES, and if the regional model you are downscaling from is not de-tied (i.e. it has tides) you might be giving ROMS the tidal forcing twice ...
Another thing you might want to look at are your barotropic boundary conditions. If you are using ADD_FSOBC & ADD_U2OBC as well as SSH_TIDES/UV_TIDES, and if the regional model you are downscaling from is not de-tied (i.e. it has tides) you might be giving ROMS the tidal forcing twice ...
- Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:02 pm
- Forum: User Applications
- Topic: DSTART, TIDE_START & TIME_REF in the *.in file
- Replies: 2
- Views: 16804
Re: DSTART, TIDE_START & TIME_REF in the *.in file
Hello,
The way I understand it is:
dstart = time_start - time_ref
tide_start = tide_base_date - time_start
Where time_ref='19960101', time_start='19960501' and tide_base_date is the base date you used when generating the tide forcing file. Basically if your tide base date pre-dates your ...
The way I understand it is:
dstart = time_start - time_ref
tide_start = tide_base_date - time_start
Where time_ref='19960101', time_start='19960501' and tide_base_date is the base date you used when generating the tide forcing file. Basically if your tide base date pre-dates your ...
- Mon Mar 09, 2015 5:27 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Lagrangian floats problem/question
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5874
Re: Lagrangian floats problem/question
Hello,
I am having issues trying to use the lagrangian floats implemented in ROMS.
I compiled ROMS using svn version 655 with #define FLAOTS. My input file
looks like this:
Lfloats == T
! Switch to control the printing of floats positions to standard output
! file, [1:Ngrids].
!
Fprint ...
I am having issues trying to use the lagrangian floats implemented in ROMS.
I compiled ROMS using svn version 655 with #define FLAOTS. My input file
looks like this:
Lfloats == T
! Switch to control the printing of floats positions to standard output
! file, [1:Ngrids].
!
Fprint ...
- Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:42 pm
- Forum: ROMS FAQ
- Topic: Tidal forcing at the open boundary
- Replies: 23
- Views: 101960
Re: Tidal forcing at the open boundary
Ok, I see your point it would be ideal for me to test both ways.
I don't have any experience filtering the tides and from what I have read so far it doesn't seem trivial. Do you have any material that may be helpful, or could you point me in the right direction?
Any suggestion is welcome and ...
I don't have any experience filtering the tides and from what I have read so far it doesn't seem trivial. Do you have any material that may be helpful, or could you point me in the right direction?
Any suggestion is welcome and ...
- Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:37 am
- Forum: ROMS FAQ
- Topic: Tidal forcing at the open boundary
- Replies: 23
- Views: 101960
Re: Tidal forcing at the open boundary
Thanks for the reply Kate,
Boundary conditions from NCOM are given every 3 hours and I would say tides are really good (they also assimilate altimetry) but I can't say if better than TPXO, probably not.
So it would probably be better if I provide tide currents from OTPS or adcirc and filter tide ...
Boundary conditions from NCOM are given every 3 hours and I would say tides are really good (they also assimilate altimetry) but I can't say if better than TPXO, probably not.
So it would probably be better if I provide tide currents from OTPS or adcirc and filter tide ...
- Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:18 am
- Forum: ROMS FAQ
- Topic: Tidal forcing at the open boundary
- Replies: 23
- Views: 101960
Re: Tidal forcing at the open boundary
Quick question,
I want to set up an operational system simulating full ocean physics in the Caribbean, meaning I want to simulate tides along with wind induced currents and so on. I am providing tidal forcing (tidal ssh and tidal induced currents) at the open boundaries via a netcdf tide forcing ...
I want to set up an operational system simulating full ocean physics in the Caribbean, meaning I want to simulate tides along with wind induced currents and so on. I am providing tidal forcing (tidal ssh and tidal induced currents) at the open boundaries via a netcdf tide forcing ...
- Fri Aug 02, 2013 6:00 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Plot velocity vectors
- Replies: 11
- Views: 11436
Re: Plot velocity vectors
Try putting a dot before the multiplication in {sqrt(-1)*v}
So it should look like {sqrt(-1).*v}
I think the reason dimensions do not agree is because you are doing a matrix multiplication of a single value and a matrix instead of an element-wise (or point-wise) multiplication of the matrix with the ...
So it should look like {sqrt(-1).*v}
I think the reason dimensions do not agree is because you are doing a matrix multiplication of a single value and a matrix instead of an element-wise (or point-wise) multiplication of the matrix with the ...
- Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:57 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Model blowing up
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2135
Re: Model blowing up
gloeg002:
I have roughly 1 year of experience with ROMS but I'm pretty sure your problem is with your vertical grid. As you can see the model is blowing up at your first level (111 , 96, 01) , but more importantly your maximum grid stiffness ratios are off the roof! This is specially important if ...
I have roughly 1 year of experience with ROMS but I'm pretty sure your problem is with your vertical grid. As you can see the model is blowing up at your first level (111 , 96, 01) , but more importantly your maximum grid stiffness ratios are off the roof! This is specially important if ...
- Sat May 18, 2013 4:14 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Extreme zeta values and OBC
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3278
Re: Extreme zeta values and OBC
I had a similar problem in a real application. I would suggest as Kate mentioned to provide boundary values (including zeta), the better the temporal update on the values the better solution you may get. What I do in my model is extract initial and boundary values at 3hr intervals from a coarser ...
- Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:46 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Question about roms_tool?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3539
Re: Question about roms_tool?
Safoora,
etopo2 is a 2min Global bathymetry by ngdc, WOAXXXX and COADS are the World Global Atlas and the Comprehensive Ocean Atmospheric Data Set, both global. These two are good for basin scale resolution or lower. If you are working with regional models closer to shore with resolutions higher ...
etopo2 is a 2min Global bathymetry by ngdc, WOAXXXX and COADS are the World Global Atlas and the Comprehensive Ocean Atmospheric Data Set, both global. These two are good for basin scale resolution or lower. If you are working with regional models closer to shore with resolutions higher ...
- Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:46 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Doubts about Seagrid
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5263
Re: Doubts about Seagrid
I have never tried to load two coastlines at the same time in Seagrid, but I do know that coastline files are just a longitude, latitude pair where coastline segments are separated by Nans. So I would just try to separate file 1 and 2 by a pair of Nans so that Seagrid knows these are separated ...
- Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:34 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Problems in make_clim.m
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3206
Re: Problems in make_clim.m
Hi,
Since you have an error in:
% Create S-coordinate system: based on model topography h(i,j),
% fast-time-averaged free-surface field and vertical coordinate
% transformation metrics compute evolving depths of of the three-
% dimensional model grid.
%
hinv=1./h;
and:
% Get the sigma depths ...
Since you have an error in:
% Create S-coordinate system: based on model topography h(i,j),
% fast-time-averaged free-surface field and vertical coordinate
% transformation metrics compute evolving depths of of the three-
% dimensional model grid.
%
hinv=1./h;
and:
% Get the sigma depths ...
- Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:27 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Error encountered in compiling jobcomp using Romstools
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8865
Re: Error encountered in compiling jobcomp using Romstools
Hi Jerry,
I got this same error a couple of weeks ago using ROMS AGRIF version. You error is most probably because you are not giving the correct path for the netcdf libraries. Make sure your netcdf libraries are set correctly in your jobcomp script. From waht you posted my guess is your netcdf ...
I got this same error a couple of weeks ago using ROMS AGRIF version. You error is most probably because you are not giving the correct path for the netcdf libraries. Make sure your netcdf libraries are set correctly in your jobcomp script. From waht you posted my guess is your netcdf ...
- Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:22 pm
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Problem in make_grid.m routine
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7312
Re: Problem in make_grid.m routine
Hi Iassad,
Here are some observations on your romstools_param.m that may be the source of your problem:
"grdname=['c:\Litos\ROMS\tools\ROMS_TOOLS\roms_queiroz_grd.nc'];"
I do not know why you specifed this path, but the routine make_grid.m may not find the grid if you save it in another directory ...
Here are some observations on your romstools_param.m that may be the source of your problem:
"grdname=['c:\Litos\ROMS\tools\ROMS_TOOLS\roms_queiroz_grd.nc'];"
I do not know why you specifed this path, but the routine make_grid.m may not find the grid if you save it in another directory ...