Perhaps this is explained elsewhere on the ROMS forum, but I'm not sure that it is possible to run a program on 1 core of a dual core processor. How do you know that you are not already using both cores?
Could someone more knowledgeable about these kinds of issues clarify this?
Search found 15 matches
- Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:48 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Problems with MPI and inlet_test
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4391
- Sun May 16, 2010 10:43 am
- Forum: ROMS Trivia
- Topic: Sock news
- Replies: 9
- Views: 16397
Re: Sock news
So, which sock design is yours? If not featured on the webpage, can we have a photo??
- Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:54 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: horizontal viscosity/diffusivity
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3758
Horizontal viscosity/diffusivity
I also have the Smagorinsky eddy viscosity/diffusivity on my wish list.
cheers,
Deb
cheers,
Deb
- Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:07 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: how to use roms plot package?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 17913
Re: how to use roms plot package?
If there is no separate grid file, you should set the main output file ocean_his.nc as the grid file in cnt.in. Set all of the top, bottom, left and right map coordinates to zero to plot the full horizontal domain. It is difficult to know exactly what your problem is without seeing the whole of your ...
- Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:29 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: how to use roms plot package?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 17913
Re: how to use roms plot package?
Hi,
There should also be sample input files for each program, named cnt.in, csec.in etc.
Edit the appropriate input file and if you are using Unix/Linux, you can run the executable with input from the .in file using the command
cnt < cnt.in
or similar.
regards,
Deborah
There should also be sample input files for each program, named cnt.in, csec.in etc.
Edit the appropriate input file and if you are using Unix/Linux, you can run the executable with input from the .in file using the command
cnt < cnt.in
or similar.
regards,
Deborah
- Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:55 am
- Forum: ROMS FAQ
- Topic: Bottom stress in ROMS
- Replies: 4
- Views: 21221
Bottom Velocities
Hi,
In a 3D application with quadratic bottom friction what do the velocities at the lowest level in the model represent?
Are they a shear velocity (u*) or the velocity at the top of an assumed constant stress bottom boundary layer or something different?
cheers,
Deborah
In a 3D application with quadratic bottom friction what do the velocities at the lowest level in the model represent?
Are they a shear velocity (u*) or the velocity at the top of an assumed constant stress bottom boundary layer or something different?
cheers,
Deborah
- Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:40 am
- Forum: ROMS Information
- Topic: LAB_CANYON Example
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2496
LAB_CANYON Example
Hi,
Does anyone have a reference for the LAB_CANYON example problem, in particular how is the additional centripetal acceleration being added in?
thanks,
Deborah
Does anyone have a reference for the LAB_CANYON example problem, in particular how is the additional centripetal acceleration being added in?
thanks,
Deborah
- Mon Dec 26, 2005 9:16 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: rst problems
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3129
Re: rst problems
Hi Amanda, Yes, I found the same problem when I first tried restarting with v2.2. There seems to have been a slight change in the logic compared to v2.1. Before restarting with v2.2, you need to undefine any CPP variables which set the initial values analytically (eg. ANA_INITIAL ) and recompile ...
- Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:19 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Time-averaging of barotropic fields and Power Law Filter
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8961
- Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:23 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Problem with vertical velocities at tile boundaries
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2939
Re: Problem with vertical velocities at tile boundaries
After a bit more checking, I think my problem was caused by some side sponge layers I had inadvertently left in from a previous (single tile) run. When I had more than one tile in the I-direction they were being applied at the sides of every tile. Sorry about that! :oops: I guess it shows there is a ...
- Fri Sep 30, 2005 9:52 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Problem with vertical velocities at tile boundaries
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2939
Problem with vertical velocities at tile boundaries
Running ROMS 2.2 in 3D with MPI and partitioning in the I-direction, I get significant discontinuities in the vertical velocities at the tile boundaries.
The problem disappears if the model is tiled only in the J-direction.
Has anyone else noticed this?
Deborah
The problem disappears if the model is tiled only in the J-direction.
Has anyone else noticed this?
Deborah
- Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:37 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Running the multiple connected domain set-up with ROMS
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5254
- Tue Aug 30, 2005 2:56 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: No slip vs. free slip around masked land areas
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8428
No slip vs. free slip around masked land areas
Just wondering whether I should expect much difference in the results around masked land areas using no slip ( gamma2=-1 ) as opposed to free slip ( gamma2=1 ) boundaries. For a 2D test case - a 1km diameter cylindrical island in 100m water depth with uniform 50m grid spacing in a channel with a ...
- Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:02 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Stretching parameters - vertical coordinates
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9457
- Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:45 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Stretching parameters - vertical coordinates
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9457
Re: Stretching parameters - vertical coordinates
In my current application of the model, I am not applying a surface wind stress and would sometimes like more resolution in the bottom boundary layer, but not at the surface. Using theta_s and theta_b it seems possible to increase the resolution at the surface only or at both surface and bottom. Is ...