Search found 2 matches
- Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:10 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: some question about define UV_SMAGORINSKY and TP_SMAGORINSKY
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2919
Re: some question about define UV_SMAGORINSKY and TP_SMAGORI
Hi Kate, Thank you so much. I follow your advice to compare checkdefs.F with $SCRATCH_DIR/checkdefs.f90 and make sure that these are indeed not defined. I also read checkdefs.F and find out that if I want to define UV_SMAGORINSKY, I should also define UV_DIF2 or UV_DIF4. LIke wise, I should also ...
- Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:19 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: some question about define UV_SMAGORINSKY and TP_SMAGORINSKY
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2919
some question about define UV_SMAGORINSKY and TP_SMAGORINSKY
dear everyone: I'm a new user. I'm trying to find whether there really badly False diffusion in the advection. So I define UV_SMAGORINSKY, TP_SMAGORINSKY, MIX_S_UV and MIX_S_TS to do the experiment. Here is my CPP options: # define SOLVE3D # define UV_COR # define UV_ADV # define UV_QDRAG # define ...