Hi,
I modified pyroms smoothing code.
(bath_tools.RoughnessMatrix => RoughMtrx,
bathy_smoothing.smoothing_Laplacian_rx0 => smthng_laplacian_rx0,
bathy_smoothing.smoothing_PlusMinus_rx0 => smthng_PlsMns_rx0)
They worked faster than the originals.
If you like, you can pick them up from
https ...
Search found 4 matches
- Mon Nov 14, 2022 7:46 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: Modified pyroms smoothing code
- Replies: 0
- Views: 15429
- Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:09 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: nesting about fine2coarse
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2993
nesting about fine2coarse
Hi,
I tried a test case using DEFINE nesting.
I think there might be bugs about fine2coarse.
Please let me know if these are bugs, if you know well about fine2coase.
I think that line 291-293 in main3d.F
IF ((istep.eq.Nsteps).and.(RefineScale(ng).gt.0)) THEN
CALL nesting (ng, iNLM, n2way)
END ...
I tried a test case using DEFINE nesting.
I think there might be bugs about fine2coarse.
Please let me know if these are bugs, if you know well about fine2coase.
I think that line 291-293 in main3d.F
IF ((istep.eq.Nsteps).and.(RefineScale(ng).gt.0)) THEN
CALL nesting (ng, iNLM, n2way)
END ...
- Mon Jul 29, 2013 8:14 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Nesting + MPI parallel
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3230
Nesting + MPI parallel
Hi,
I tried a test case using nesting model + mpi parallel.
But, Blowing up at the first step.
I found that it may be a bug in Nesting.F of ROMS revison 674, if parallel application is on.
It is around calculating cff1 for mass flux at the physical boundaries in SUBROUTINE put_refine2d ...
I tried a test case using nesting model + mpi parallel.
But, Blowing up at the first step.
I found that it may be a bug in Nesting.F of ROMS revison 674, if parallel application is on.
It is around calculating cff1 for mass flux at the physical boundaries in SUBROUTINE put_refine2d ...
- Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:21 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: passive tracer + KPP(LMD_NONLOCAL) option
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1611
passive tracer + KPP(LMD_NONLOCAL) option
Dear ROM people,
I tried to calculate a passive tracer with define KPP option.
The tracer was calculated to be not 0, although I. C. and all B. C. of the tracer were set to 0.d0.
I read lines form 763 to 777 of pre_step3d.F as follows;
DO itrc=1,NT(ng)
ltrc=MIN(NAT,itrc)
DO k=1,N(ng)-1
DO i ...
I tried to calculate a passive tracer with define KPP option.
The tracer was calculated to be not 0, although I. C. and all B. C. of the tracer were set to 0.d0.
I read lines form 763 to 777 of pre_step3d.F as follows;
DO itrc=1,NT(ng)
ltrc=MIN(NAT,itrc)
DO k=1,N(ng)-1
DO i ...